Publication:
Two new polymers as candidates for rhinoplasty allografts: an experimental study in a rabbit model

dc.contributor.coauthorCingi, Cemal
dc.contributor.coauthorÇallı, Aylin
dc.contributor.coauthorErdoğmuş, Nagehan
dc.contributor.coauthorÇallı, Çağlar
dc.contributor.coauthorBal, Cengiz
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemistry
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemistry
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemistry
dc.contributor.kuauthorYılgör, İskender
dc.contributor.kuauthorYılgör, Emel
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Sciences
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Sciences
dc.contributor.yokid24181
dc.contributor.yokid40527
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T22:58:21Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study was performed to evaluate the biocompatibility and tensile strength of two new polymeric materials - a polyfluoro ether modified thermoplastic polyurethane urea and a polydimethyl silicone elastomer in an experimental rabbit model. Methods: The two polymers were implanted inside separate subperichondrial pockets created over the auricular cartilages of 12 rabbits. A control pocket received no implant. After 3 months, the animals were painlessly sacrificed, and each site was analyzed histologically for vascular congestion, acute and chronic inflammation, and fibrosis in the tissue surrounding the implant materials. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in vascular congestion, fibrosis, or acute or chronic inflammation between the control sites and either implant site. Conclusions: These results suggest that the polymers are well accepted by the tissue and remain stable during the entire study period, and that they could be very suitable materials for use in nasal reconstruction.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume122
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/000348941312200712
dc.identifier.issn0003-4894
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84881238078
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348941312200712
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/7701
dc.identifier.wos321880700012
dc.keywordsAllograft
dc.keywordsBiocompatibility
dc.keywordsExperimental study
dc.keywordsNasal reconstruction
dc.keywordsPolymer
dc.keywordsRabbit model
dc.keywordsRhinoplasty
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSage
dc.sourceAnnals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology
dc.subjectOtorhinolaryngology
dc.titleTwo new polymers as candidates for rhinoplasty allografts: an experimental study in a rabbit model
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-7756-4192
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-9133-3377
local.contributor.kuauthorYılgör, İskender
local.contributor.kuauthorYılgör, Emel
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication035d8150-86c9-4107-af16-a6f0a4d538eb
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery035d8150-86c9-4107-af16-a6f0a4d538eb

Files