Publication:
Comparison of constant and variable discharge flow and force coefficients for reciprocating compressor

dc.contributor.coauthorKarabay, Ahmet Yasin
dc.contributor.coauthorSahin, Caglar
dc.contributor.departmentMARC (Manufacturing and Automation Research Center)
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorPashak, Pouya
dc.contributor.kuauthorLazoğlu, İsmail
dc.contributor.kuauthorMalik, Anjum Naeem
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteResearch Center
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:33:39Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractEnhancing the mathematical models always have been a critical issue in every field, and the reciprocating compressors are not exceptional. Flow and force coefficients are two empirical factors that help to calculate the mass flow rate through the valve and gas force, respectively. These coefficients can be considered constant values or valve lift dependent. However, in the discharge process, the piston is close to the top dead center, which may affect the discharge flow field and, subsequently, the coefficients.These coefficients should be determined by experiments or numerical simulations such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Experiments are expensive, and the exact geometry may not always be available to perform the CFD analysis. Also, CFD analysis for various valve lifts and piston positions is computationally expensive.This study studied the effect of constant, single variable (valve lift dependent) and double variable (valve lift and piston position dependent) coefficients on compressor performance and discharge valve movement in three operating conditions. A mathematical model was developed for this purpose, and a 3-D CFD simulation was used to compute the coefficients. To validate the results, a strain gauge and a calorimeter were used as measurement tools.The single and double variable models captured the valve behavior, and pressure picks better than the constant model. However, the constant model estimated the indicated power, cooling capacity, and COP with good accuracy. In predicting the discharge losses, the double variable model was the most reliable among the others.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank Arcelik AS and the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey for supporting this project (TUEBITAK Project No:118C141) .
dc.description.volume151
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2023.02.019
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2081
dc.identifier.issn0140-7007
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85173561455
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2023.02.019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26648
dc.identifier.wos1102698800001
dc.keywordsReciprocating compressor
dc.keywordsFlow and force coefficient
dc.keywordsMathematical model
dc.keywordsReed valve
dc.keywordsPiston position
dc.keywordsStrain gauge
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relation.grantnoScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUEBITAK) [118C141]; Arcelik AS
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Refrigeration
dc.subjectThermodynamics
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleComparison of constant and variable discharge flow and force coefficients for reciprocating compressor
dc.title.alternativeComparaison des coefficients constants et variables d’écoulement et de force du refoulement d'un compresseur alternatif
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorLazoğlu, İsmail
local.contributor.kuauthorPashak, Pouya
local.contributor.kuauthorMalik, Anjum Naeem
local.publication.orgunit1College of Engineering
local.publication.orgunit1GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
local.publication.orgunit1Research Center
local.publication.orgunit2Department of Mechanical Engineering
local.publication.orgunit2MARC (Manufacturing and Automation Research Center)
local.publication.orgunit2Graduate School of Sciences and Engineering
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication52df3968-be7f-4c06-92e5-3b48e79ba93a
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationba2836f3-206d-4724-918c-f598f0086a36
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3fc31c89-e803-4eb1-af6b-6258bc42c3d8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery52df3968-be7f-4c06-92e5-3b48e79ba93a
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication434c9663-2b11-4e66-9399-c863e2ebae43
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublicationd437580f-9309-4ecb-864a-4af58309d287
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164

Files