Publication:
Understanding mammal avoidance of human settlements

dc.contributor.coauthorPotts, J. R.
dc.contributor.coauthorBörger, L.
dc.contributor.coauthorTucker, M. A.
dc.contributor.coauthorOssi, F.
dc.contributor.coauthorYanco, S. W.
dc.contributor.coauthorEllis‐Soto, D.
dc.contributor.coauthorMüller, T.
dc.contributor.coauthorOliver, R. Y.
dc.contributor.coauthorAlves, M. H.
dc.contributor.coauthorArnold, W.
dc.contributor.coauthorAttias, N.
dc.contributor.coauthorBastille‐Rousseau, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorBelant, J. L.
dc.contributor.coauthorBlount, J. D.
dc.contributor.coauthorBeyer, D. E.
dc.contributor.coauthorCagnacci, F.
dc.contributor.coauthorChamaillé‐Jammes, S.
dc.contributor.coauthorChan, A. N.
dc.contributor.coauthorCole, E. K.
dc.contributor.coauthorCornils, J. S.
dc.contributor.coauthorde Paula, R. C.
dc.contributor.coauthorDeNicola, V.
dc.contributor.coauthorDesbiez, A. L. J.
dc.contributor.coauthorDewey, S. R.
dc.contributor.coauthorDrake, D.
dc.contributor.coauthorEgan, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorEikelboom, J. A. J.
dc.contributor.coauthorFarmer, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorGarel, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorGoheen, J. R.
dc.contributor.coauthorHansen, H. P.
dc.contributor.coauthorHaugaard, L.
dc.contributor.coauthorHebblewhite, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorHeim, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorJežek, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorJordán, L.
dc.contributor.coauthorKamaru, D. N.
dc.contributor.coauthorKrofel, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorLaSharr, T. N.
dc.contributor.coauthorLeimgruber, P.
dc.contributor.coauthorLoison, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorLong, R. A.
dc.contributor.coauthorLoretto, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorMarchand, P.
dc.contributor.coauthorMeisingset, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorMelzheimer, J.
dc.contributor.coauthorMonteith, K. L.
dc.contributor.coauthorMorgan, J. J.
dc.contributor.coauthorMortensen, R. M.
dc.contributor.coauthorMueller, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorMysterud, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorOlejarz, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorOliveira, T.
dc.contributor.coauthorPanzacchi, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorPortas, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorPotočnik, H.
dc.contributor.coauthorPrins, H. H. T.
dc.contributor.coauthorPrugh, L. R.
dc.contributor.coauthorRanc, N.
dc.contributor.coauthorRoeder, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorRolandsen, C. M.
dc.contributor.coauthorSelimovic, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorSmiley, R.
dc.contributor.coauthorSolberg, E. J.
dc.contributor.coauthorStrand, O.
dc.contributor.coauthorSunde, P.
dc.contributor.coauthorToïgo, C.
dc.contributor.coauthorVan Moorter, B.
dc.contributor.coauthorVerzuh, T. L.
dc.contributor.coauthorWachter, B.
dc.contributor.coauthorWagler, B. L.
dc.contributor.coauthorWhittington, J.
dc.contributor.coauthorWilmers, C. C.
dc.contributor.coauthorWittemyer, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorRutz, C.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics
dc.contributor.kuauthorŞekercioğlu, Çağan Hakkı
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-22T13:09:17Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractAnthropogenic land conversion is putting increasing pressure on wildlife populations around the world. To mitigate impacts, it is necessary to develop a detailed mechanistic understanding of how animals are affected by different types of human activity. A key challenge is to disentangle the effects of static infrastructure, like roads or buildings, and the presence of humans in the landscape. To address this question, we examined if terrestrial mammals altered their movement behaviour around buildings in response to reduced human mobility during COVID‐19 lockdowns. We compiled GPS tracking data from 35 study sites across five continents, for 10 carnivore species and 13 herbivore species, totalling >1 million location records from 586 individuals. For each study, we used integrated step selection analysis to test the extent to which animals changed their avoidance of buildings as lockdown took effect, leveraging the recently released Microsoft MLBuildings dataset of global building locations. Analysis of population‐level effects revealed that, in areas with high Human Footprint Index (HFI), animals tended to show a significant reduction in their avoidance of buildings during lockdown, but not in low HFI areas. No such trend was detected during equivalent periods in years other than 2020, indicating that behavioural changes were a result of reduced human mobility during lockdowns. Overall, our findings suggest that animals living alongside humans exhibit greater plasticity when people change their behaviour, likely indicating the combined effects of environmental filtering and habituation. More generally, our study provides a critical first step towards developing evidence‐based tools for forecasting how wildlife movement behaviour may change in response to different land‐use strategies, human activities, conservation interventions or environmental perturbations.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuEU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article is a contribution of the COVID-19 Bio-Logging Initiative, which is funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF9881) and the National Geographic Society (NGS-82515R-20) (both grants to CR). The ideas for this subproject were initially developed by LB, JRP and CR during the BES Movement Ecology 2023 Annual Meeting and they thank the organisers. JRP acknowledges NERC grant NE/X000680/1 and thanks the University of Sheffield for granting study leave used in part for the research reported here. JM acknowledges the Messerli Foundation, Switzerland. ANC acknowledges the USFWS Asian Elephant Conservation Fund and St. Louis Zoo. EKC acknowledges the Grand Teton Association, which provided funding to support the purchase of GPS tracking collars. LRP acknowledges NSF grant DEB-1652420. GBR acknowledges the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration grant W87-R. RAL acknowledges NSF grant IOS-1656642 and National Geographic Society grant WW-268C-17. SRD acknowledges funding from the National Park Service and the Grand Teton National Park Foundation to support the purchase of GPS tracking collars. The golden jackal project in Slovenia (CRP V1-1626) was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food and Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency. Lynx research in Slovenia was funded by the Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (grant J1-50013) and the European Commission (grant LIFE16 NAT/SL/000634). KM acknowledges support of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Wyoming Governor's Big Game License Coalition, Wyoming Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust, Muley Fanatic Foundation, Bowhunters of Wyoming, Bureau of Land Management, National Wild Sheep Foundation, Wyoming Wild Sheep Foundation, Animal Damage Management Board, Knobloch Family Foundation, EJK Foundation. JAJE acknowledges Welgevonden Game Reserve (South Africa) for the elephant tracking data. DES acknowledges support from NASA FINESST (80NSSC22K1535). PS acknowledges donations from The Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Lovenholm) and Aage V. Jensen Naturfond (Ovstrup) and the support from local landowners, hunters and other participants of the research project 'Red deer-Knowledge, values and management'. SCJ acknowledges the support of the University of Montpellier through the REPOS project. BW thanks the Messerli Foundation, Switzerland, for funding and the Ministry of Environment, Forestry and Tourism for permission to conduct the study. PM acknowledges funding from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the Movit project (ANR 16-CE02-0010) and thanks all the people from the Office Francais de la Biodiversite. MCL acknowledges funding from the government of Lower Austria for GPS tracking the red deer.
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentile95
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.WoSPercentile97.5
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2656.70298
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2656
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.grantnoGBMF9881
dc.identifier.grantnoDEB-1652420
dc.identifier.grantnoIOS-1656642
dc.identifier.grantnoNE/X000680/1
dc.identifier.grantnoLIFE16 NAT/SL/000634
dc.identifier.grantnoNGS-82515R-20
dc.identifier.grantnoWW-268C-17
dc.identifier.grantnoCRP V1-1626
dc.identifier.grantnoJ1-50013
dc.identifier.grantnoANR 16-CE02-0010
dc.identifier.grantno80NSSC22K1535
dc.identifier.issn0021-8790
dc.identifier.pubmed42383642
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105043538371
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70298
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/33816
dc.identifier.wos001808704800001
dc.keywordsAnthropause
dc.keywordsBio-logging
dc.keywordsGPS tracking
dc.keywordsHuman-wildlife coexistence
dc.keywordsStep selection
dc.keywordsSustainability
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Ecology
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectZoology
dc.titleUnderstanding mammal avoidance of human settlements
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationaee2d329-aabe-4b58-ba67-09dbf8575547
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaee2d329-aabe-4b58-ba67-09dbf8575547
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublicationaf0395b0-7219-4165-a909-7016fa30932d
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaf0395b0-7219-4165-a909-7016fa30932d

Files