Publication:
Controversial issues in the treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy: a journey through historical course

dc.contributor.coauthorEker, Serhat
dc.contributor.coauthorGedik, Şansal
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorŞahin, Afsun
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:59:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractTraumatic optic neuropathy (TON) can occur by either direct injury or an indirect way which can develop secondary to transfer forces occurring due to trauma in frontal and maxillary bones to optic canal. The involvement of productive individuals at younger age groups makes it more important. Since TON is accompanied by multiple traumas, the diagnosis of TON is generally challenging and delayed in these patients usually requiring ICU follow-up. The treatment in patients diagnosed as TON is one of the most controversial issues in neuro-ophthalmology. The clinical experiences on treatment of TON have been built on 'National Spinal Cord Injury Study II and III2 trials rather than small cases series and the results had been found satisfactory. On the other hand, the concerns about translation of results from studies on spinal cord injury treatment to optic nerve injuries have been increased with the results of 'International Optic Nerve Trauma Study' showing no difference between groups underwent observation, steroid treatment or optic canal decompression. Additionally, the results from 'Medical Research Council-Corticosteroid Randomisation After Signifi cant Head Injury' study, which showed statistically signifi cantly higher mortality rates within fi rst two weeks of mega-dose steroid treatments compared to placebo groups, have promoted us to review our treatment protocols. As similar to stroke and degenerative neurological disorders, the effi ciency of neuroprotective agents have been investigated and molecules like erythropoietin are promising. The major challenges in the treatment of TON are high spontaneous recovery rates due to the nature of the disorder and lacking of class I evidence from multi-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind studies comparing different treatment modalities. This review aimed to summarize different studies which form our preferences in treatment of TON. © 2020 Gazi Eye Foundation. All rights reserved.
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyTR Dizin
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume29
dc.identifier.doi10.37845/RET.VIT.2020.29.66
dc.identifier.issn1300-1256
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109590781
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.37845/RET.VIT.2020.29.66
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/15578
dc.keywordsNeuroprotection
dc.keywordsTraumatic optic neuropathy
dc.keywordsTreatment erythropoietin
dc.keywordsMemantine
dc.keywordsMethylprednisolone
dc.keywordsPrednisolone
dc.keywordsRiluzole
dc.keywordssteroid
dc.keywordsAnterior ischemic optic Neuropathy
dc.keywordsHuman
dc.keywordsNerve surgery
dc.keywordsNeuroprotection
dc.keywordsOptic nerve disease
dc.keywordsOptic nerve injury
dc.keywordsPriority journal
dc.keywordsReview
dc.keywordsSteroid therapy
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherGazi Eye Foundation
dc.relation.ispartofRetina-Vitreus
dc.subjectOptics
dc.subjectEye disease
dc.subjectEye-sockets
dc.titleControversial issues in the treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy: a journey through historical course
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorŞahin, Afsun
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files