Improved survival in contemporary community-based patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma undergoing active treatment

Abstract

Background: We hypothesized that the evolving treatment paradigms recommended based on phase III trials may have translated into improved overall survival (OS) in contemporary community-based patients with clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) undergoing active treatment. Patients and Methods: Within the SEER database, contemporary (2017–2020) and historical (2010–2016) patients with ccmRCC treated with either systemic therapy (ST), cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN), or both (ST+CN) were identified. Univariable and multivariable Cox-regression models were used. Results: Overall, 993 (32%) contemporary versus 2,106 (68%) historical patients with ccmRCC were identified. Median OS was 41 months in contemporary versus 25 months in historical patients (∆=16 months; P <.001). In multivariable Cox-regression analyses, contemporary membership was independently associated with lower overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6–0.8; P <.001). In patients treated with ST alone, median OS was 17 months in contemporary versus 10 months in historical patients (∆=7 months; P <.001; multivariable HR, 0.7; P =.005). In patients treated with CN alone, median OS was not reached in contemporary versus 33 months in historical patients (∆=not available; P <.001; multivariable HR, 0.7; P <.001). In patients treated with ST+CN, median OS was 38 months in contemporary versus 26 months in historical patients (∆=12 months; P <.001; multivariable HR, 0.7; P =.003). Conclusions: Contemporary community-based patients with ccmRCC receiving active treatment clearly exhibited better survival than their historical counterparts, when examined as one group, as well as when examined as separate subgroups according to treatment type. Treatment advancements of phase III trials seem to be applied appropriately outside of centers of excellence.