Publication:
A comparison of the survival and implantation rates of blastocysts that were vitrified on postfertilization day five, six and seven

dc.contributor.coauthorBerrin, Avci
dc.contributor.coauthorIsil, Kasapoglu
dc.contributor.coauthorGoktan, Kuspinar
dc.contributor.coauthorSeda, Saribal
dc.contributor.coauthorGurkan, Uncu
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid182910
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:12:25Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this retrospective cohort study was to compare survival, implantation, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between blastocysts that were vitrified on post-fertilization days 5, 6 and 7. Before vitrification, blastocysts were evaluated in terms of morphology and blastocyst expansion, inner cell mass and trophectoderm quality. They were thawed and transfered in a subsequent artificial cycle. Embryo implantation rates were 39%, 25% and 25% for blastocysts that were vitrified on days 5, 6, and 7, respectively (p = 0.006). Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were 19%, 12%, 13% (p = 0.100) and 9%, 7%, 12% (p = 0.99) for days 5, 6 and 7 blastocysts, respectively. Day 5 blastocysts had significantly higher full-collapsing score after assisted-hatching compared to days 6 and 7 blastocysts (p = 0.014). As blastocyst quality increased, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates increased in all groups and both parameters were statistically significantly higher on day 5 blastocysts than on days 6 or 7 (p = 0.001). It was clearly found that good quality blastocysts obtained on day 5 have higher implantation and clinical pregnancy rates than 6th and 7th day cryopreserved embryos. There were no statistically significant differences between the cryopreserved embryos on days 6 and 7 regarding the implantation, clinic and ongoing pregnancy rates.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipUludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey This study was funded by the Research Fund of the Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
dc.description.volume22
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14647273.2018.1468091
dc.identifier.eissn1742-8149
dc.identifier.issn1464-7273
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85046401103
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2018.1468091
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/9809
dc.identifier.wos477012400009
dc.keywordsBlastocysts
dc.keywordsVitrification
dc.keywordsEmbryo viability
dc.keywordsLate blastulation in-vitro fertilization
dc.keywordsEmbryo transfers
dc.keywordsTransfer cycles
dc.keywordsLive-birth
dc.keywordsVitrification
dc.keywordsPregnancy
dc.keywordsMorphology
dc.keywordsCleavage
dc.keywordsFresh
dc.keywordsTime
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd
dc.sourceHuman Fertility
dc.subjectObstetrics
dc.subjectGynecology
dc.subjectReproductive biology
dc.titleA comparison of the survival and implantation rates of blastocysts that were vitrified on postfertilization day five, six and seven
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-1106-3747
local.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış

Files