Publication: Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Staging Classification of Pressure Injuries
| dc.contributor.coauthor | Demir Uctepe, Ayse Silanur | |
| dc.contributor.coauthor | Battal, Ahmet Emin | |
| dc.contributor.coauthor | Gulec, Cevat | |
| dc.contributor.coauthor | Ergun, Eren | |
| dc.contributor.coauthor | Bakcaci, Ahmet | |
| dc.contributor.coauthor | Karadag, Ayise | |
| dc.contributor.coauthor | Demir Uctepe, Cigdem Gunduz | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-31T08:19:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to design an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that can more accurately and objectively identify different stages of pressure injuries (PIs).METHODS:In this study, the authors proposed using AI and computer vision to classify PI images by stage. To this end, the authors implemented a classification network and trained it on a set of PIs images labeled with their stages. This dataset included images from 2 different sources, namely the publicly available Pressure Injury Image Dataset (1091 images), and a private dataset from Ko & ccedil; University Wound Research Laboratory (AY-Lab) (572 images). All images were resized to 224x224 and normalized according to the ImageNet-1K dataset before model input. Various deep learning architectures, including ResNet18, ResNet18-Transformer Encoder Hybrid Model, and DenseNet-121, were used for training and testing. Three-fold cross-validation was used to ensure more robust training and testing. Multiple configurations were tested for each model, and the best-performing configuration was identified. Grad-CAM was applied to visualize attention areas for further evaluation of the model results.RESULTS:After 3-fold cross-validation, ResNet18 outperformed all tested models, achieving an average accuracy of 76.92 +/- 0.92% on the 4-class classification task. The model demonstrated the highest precision of 87.35 +/- 5.54% for Stage 1 and the lowest precision of 64.72 +/- 2.66% for Stage 3.CONCLUSIONS:The results of using the proposed computational approach for PI staging are promising. The AI model can automate PI stage classification, making it a valuable tool for clinic experts. | |
| dc.description.fulltext | Yes | |
| dc.description.harvestedfrom | Manual | |
| dc.description.indexedby | WOS | |
| dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
| dc.description.indexedby | PubMed | |
| dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
| dc.description.readpublish | N/A | |
| dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEu | N/A | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000352 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1538-8654 | |
| dc.identifier.embargo | No | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 486 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1527-7941 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 9 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 40981689 | |
| dc.identifier.quartile | N/A | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105016768196 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 480 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000352 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/31427 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 38 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 001578283400013 | |
| dc.keywords | artificial intelligence | |
| dc.keywords | assessment | |
| dc.keywords | deep learning | |
| dc.keywords | detection | |
| dc.keywords | pressure injury | |
| dc.keywords | stages and categories | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS | |
| dc.relation.affiliation | Koç University | |
| dc.relation.collection | Koç University Institutional Repository | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Advances in Skin and Wound Care | |
| dc.relation.openaccess | Yes | |
| dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs) | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Dermatology | |
| dc.subject | Nursing | |
| dc.subject | Surgery | |
| dc.title | Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Staging Classification of Pressure Injuries | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |
