Monitoring line length reproduction errors

Abstract

Previous work revealed that humans can keep track of the direction and degree of errors in their temporal and numerical reproductions/estimations. Given the behavioral and psychophysical commonalities to various magnitudes and the implication of an overlapping neuroanatomical locus for their representation, we hypothesized that participants would capture the direction of errors and confidence ratings would track the magnitude of errors in line-length reproductions. In two experiments, participants reproduced various target lengths as accurately as possible, and reported the direction of their errors and provided confidence ratings for their reproductions. The isolated analysis of these two second-order judgments showed that participants can correctly report the direction of errors in their line-length reproductions and subjective confidence decreases as the magnitude of errors increases. These results show that humans can robustly keep track of the direction of errors in their line-length reproductions and their subjective confidence corroborates the magnitude of these errors.