Publication:
Which prognostic marker is responsible for the clinical heterogeneity in CLL with 13q deletion?

dc.contributor.coauthorAras, Beyhan Durak
dc.contributor.coauthorIşık, Sevgi
dc.contributor.coauthorTeke, Hava Üsküdar
dc.contributor.coauthorAslan, Abdulvahap
dc.contributor.coauthorYavaşoğlu, Filiz
dc.contributor.coauthorGülbaş, Zafer
dc.contributor.coauthorDemirkan, Fatih
dc.contributor.coauthorÖzen, Hülya
dc.contributor.coauthorÇilingir, Oğuz
dc.contributor.coauthorİnci, Nur Sena
dc.contributor.coauthorGünden, Gülçin
dc.contributor.coauthorBulduk, Tuba
dc.contributor.coauthorGökalp, Ebru Erzurumluoğlu
dc.contributor.coauthorKocagil, Sinem
dc.contributor.coauthorArtan, Sevilhan
dc.contributor.kuauthorAkay, Olga Meltem
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid170966
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:12:02Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: deletion of 13q14 [del(13q)] is the most common cytogenetic change (50%) in chronic lymphoblastic leukemia (CLL), and it is a good prognostic factor if it is detected as a sole aberration by FISH. However, it is observed the clinical course of CLL cases with del(13q) are quite heterogeneous and the responsible for this clinical heterogeneity has not been established yet. Some investigators suggest type II deletion (include RB1 gene) is associated with more aggressive clinical course. Also, it is suggested that the deletion burden and the deletion type have a prognostic effect. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of RB1 gene deletion, deletion burden and deletion type on overall survival (OS), disease stage and time to first treatment (TTFT) in patients with isolated del(3q). Sixty eight cases, detected isolated del(13q) were included in the study. Also, RB1 deletion was analyzed from peripheral blood of them using FISH. Results: RB1 deletion was detected in 41% of patients, but there was no statistically significant difference between RB1 deletion and TTFT, stage and OS (p > 0.05). At same time, statistically significant difference was detected between high del(13q) (> 80%) and TTFT (p < 0.05). Conclusion: the statistical analysis of our data regarding to the association between RB1 deletion and deletion type, TTFT, disease stage, and OS has not confirmed type II deletion or biallelic deletion cause poor prognosis. However, our data supports the deletion burden has a prognostic effect. More studies are needed to elucidate the cause of the clinical heterogeneity of CLL cases with del(13q).
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Society of Hematology
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume14
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13039-020-00522-1
dc.identifier.eissn1755-8166
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR02669
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-020-00522-1
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85098747512
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/1128
dc.identifier.wos283229000001
dc.keywords13q deletions
dc.keywordsB-CLL
dc.keywordsFISH
dc.keywordsPrognostic marker
dc.keywordsRB1 deletions
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.grantno2017-05
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/9314
dc.sourceMolecular Cytogenetics
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectGenetics
dc.subjectHeredity
dc.titleWhich prognostic marker is responsible for the clinical heterogeneity in CLL with 13q deletion?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-6759-1939
local.contributor.kuauthorAkay, Olga Meltem

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
9314.pdf
Size:
956.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format