Publication:
Prognostic significance of body mass index and serum albumin as the indicators of nutritional status in small cell lung cancer

dc.contributor.coauthorTaş, Faruk
dc.contributor.coauthorÖztürk, Akın
dc.contributor.kuauthorErtürk, Kayhan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:39:29Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackgroundBody mass index (BMI) and serum albumin (ALB) level are long-established markers that reflect the nutritional status and eventually the prognosis of cancer patients. The objective of the study was to determine the clinical significance of these factors and specify their roles in outcomes compared with performance status (PS) and weight loss (WL), which are considered the most significant patient-related prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with platinum-etoposide-based chemotherapy.MethodsA total of 378 patients with SCLC were enrolled in the study and analyzed retrospectively.ResultsBMI values were similar by clinical stage, whereas the percentages of the patients with WL, low serum ALB, and particularly poor (>= 2) PS were significantly higher in patients with extended disease SCLC (ED-SCLC) compared to those with limited disease SCLC (LD-SCLC). In LD-SCLC, patients with poor PS lived for a significantly shorter time than patients with good PS (HR: 7.791, p = 0.0001);however, BMI (HR: 1.035, p = 0.8), WL (HR: 0.857, p = 0.5), and ALB (HR: 0.743, p = 0.3) had no significant effect on the outcome. In ED-SCLC, PS (HR: 4.257, p = 0.0001), WL (HR: 1.677, p = 0.001), and ALB (HR: 0.680, p = 0.007) had an impact on survival, but BMI did not (HR: 0.791, p = 0.08). In LD-SCLC, the univariate analysis showed that only poor PS was correlated with increased mortality (HR: 7.791, p = 0.0001);yet it lost significance in multivariate analysis. In ED-SCLC, poor PS (HR: 4.257, p = 0.0001), WL (HR: 1.667, p = 0.001), and a low ALB level (HR: 0.680, p = 0.007) were shown to be factors for poor prognosis in the univariate analysis;yet only PS remained significant in multivariate analysis (HR: 2.286, p = 0.001).ConclusionEven though BMI and serum albumin showed no prognostic value in SCLC patients treated with chemotherapy, PS was found to be the most significant prognostic factor in both LD- and ED-SCLC stages.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume136
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00325481.2024.2328512
dc.identifier.eissn1941-9260
dc.identifier.issn0032-5481
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187914165
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2328512
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/23008
dc.identifier.wos1184027300001
dc.keywordsSCLC
dc.keywordsBMI
dc.keywordsPS
dc.keywordsAlbumin
dc.keywordsPrognostic factor
dc.languageen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd
dc.sourcePostgraduate Medicine
dc.subjectMedicine, general and internal
dc.titlePrognostic significance of body mass index and serum albumin as the indicators of nutritional status in small cell lung cancer
dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorErtürk, Kayhan

Files