Publication:
The role of machine learning, deep learning, and MRI findings in the classification of pediatric posterior fossa tumors

dc.contributor.coauthorÇapar, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorKaraman, Z. F.
dc.contributor.coauthorÜnalan, S.
dc.contributor.coauthorAytan, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorTopkaraoğlu, M. K.
dc.contributor.coauthorKeserci, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorCoşkun, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorKeserci, B.
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorAkkuş, Tekin
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-19T19:50:47Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPediatric posterior fossa tumors represent a major subset of childhood central nervous system neoplasms; however, overlapping MRI features often hinder accurate non-invasive characterization. This study aimed to evaluate machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for classifying these tumors using MRI-derived radiomic features. Methods This retrospective study analyzed MRI data from 63 pediatric patients with confirmed posterior fossa tumors, including 21 medulloblastoma (MB), 20 pilocytic astrocytoma (PA), 11 ependymoma (EP), and 11 diffuse midline glioma (DMG) cases. T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and apparent diffusion coefficient sequences showing the best single-model performance were used to construct gradient boosting machine (GBM), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF) models and their ensemble combinations. Model performance was evaluated using standard classification metrics. A ResNet101V2-based DL model was developed using multiple MRI sequences. ML models were validated using fivefold cross-validation, whereas the DL model was trained using a 67/33 train–test split with data augmentation. Results The RF + GBM ensemble achieved the highest ML performance, with an overall accuracy of 78%, and showed the strongest classification for MB and PA, whereas EP and DMG remained difficult to distinguish. The DL model demonstrated high performance on T1-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, achieving accuracies of 98% and 96%, respectively, but showed lower performance on diffusion-based sequences. Conclusion ML and DL approaches improve MRI-based classification of pediatric posterior fossa tumors; however, accurate differentiation of EP and DMG remains challenging. These findings support the potential of AI-driven methods as clinically relevant, non-invasive decision-support tools in pediatric neuro-oncology.
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.ScopusPercentile53
dc.identifier.ScopusQuartileQ2
dc.identifier.WoSPercentile38.2
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ3
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00381-026-07316-7
dc.identifier.eissn1433-0350
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage13
dc.identifier.issn0256-7040
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pubmed42223485
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105040639404
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-026-07316-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/33678
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.wos001781886400002
dc.keywordsArtificial intelligence
dc.keywordsMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.keywordsPediatric neuro-oncology
dc.keywordsRadiomics
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofChild's Nervous System
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectNeurosciences and neurology
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleThe role of machine learning, deep learning, and MRI findings in the classification of pediatric posterior fossa tumors
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3fc31c89-e803-4eb1-af6b-6258bc42c3d8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3fc31c89-e803-4eb1-af6b-6258bc42c3d8
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication434c9663-2b11-4e66-9399-c863e2ebae43
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery434c9663-2b11-4e66-9399-c863e2ebae43

Files