<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
The endometrium: is thickness all that counts?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Pirtea, Paul

Date

Language

eng

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

The commonly used 7 mm threshold for endometrial thickness in assisted reproductive technology lacks strong evidence and stems from outdated data. Recent studies show that live birth outcomes are comparable even with linings of less than 7 mm, particularly when using euploid embryos. Measurement variability, confounding factors and differing clinical practices limit the reliability of endometrial thickness as a standalone predictor. While extremely thin linings may warrant further evaluation, rigid cut-off values are unjustified. Endometrial thickness should be integrated into a broader, individualized assessment rather than drive clinical decisions in isolation.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105277

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Rights and licensing

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
0
Görüntülenme
0
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators