Publication:
Fourth versus eighth week surgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in T3-4/N0+ rectal cancer: Istanbul R-01 study

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Sağlam, Sezer
Sağlam, Esra K.
Asoğlu, Oktar
Balık, Emre
Yamaner, Sümer
Başaran, Mert
Oral, Ethem N.
Kizir, Ahmet
Kapran, Yersu
Güllüoğlu, Mine

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background and purpose: The optimum duration between neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and transmesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer has not been defined yet. This randomized study was designed to compare the efficacy of four-week versus eight-week delay before surgery. Methods: One-hundred and fifty-three patients with locally advanced low-or mid-rectum rectal adenocarcinoma were included in this single center prospective randomized trial. Patients were assigned to receive surgical treatment after either four weeks or eight weeks of delay after chemoradiotherapy. Patients were followed for local recurrence and survival, and surgical specimens were examined for pathological staging and circumferential margin positivity. Results: 4-week and 8-week groups did not differ with regard to lateral surgical margin positivity (9.2% vs. 5.1%, P= 0.33, respectively), pathological tumor regression rate (P=0.90), overall survival (5-year, 76.5% vs. 74.2%, P=0.60) and local recurrence rate (11.8% vs. 10.3%, 0.77). Overall survival was better in patients with negative surgical margins (78.8% vs. 53.0%, P=0.04). Local recurrence rate was significantly higher among patients with positive surgical margin (28.5% vs. 9.3%, P=0.02). Conclusions: Intentional prolongation of the chemoradiotherapy-surgery interval does not seem to improve clinical outcomes of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Surgical margin positivity seems to be more important with this regard.

Source

Publisher

Pioneer Bioscience Publishing

Subject

Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology

Citation

Has Part

Source

Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2013.025

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

1

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details