Publication:
The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution

dc.contributor.coauthorDural, Ahmet C.
dc.contributor.coauthorKeskin, Metin
dc.contributor.coauthorBalik, Emre
dc.contributor.coauthorAkici, Murat
dc.contributor.coauthorKunduz, Enver
dc.contributor.coauthorYamaner, Sumer
dc.contributor.coauthorAsoglu, Oktar
dc.contributor.coauthorGulluoglu, Mine
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorBuğra, Dursun
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:42:21Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery on circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement. Materials and Methods: The data from 579 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or open resection of rectal cancer from October 2002 to August 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was CRM status. The secondary endpoints were morbidity, local recurrence rate, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Results: Laparoscopic resections were performed in 266 patients (46%), and the remainder of the patients underwent open resection. The rates of CRM involvement were similar between the laparoscopic and open groups (5.6% vs. 5.4%). The perioperative morbidity rates between the 2 groups were not significantly different (P = 0.2). The incidence of local recurrence for the CRM-negative group was 8.4% (8.3% laparoscopic vs. 8.45% open; P = 0.99), whereas the local recurrence rate was 34.3% for the CRM-positive group. The local recurrence rate was 20% for the CRM-positive patients in the laparoscopic group and 47% for the CRM-positive patients in the open group (P < 0.001). We did not observe any significant differences in local recurrence rates between the Lap R and Open R groups after omitting CRM status. CRM positivity was correlated with both 5-year survival and the 5-year disease-free survival rate (P = 0.009 and P = 0.001, respectively). We did not observe any significant differences in morbidity, local recurrence, or overall or disease-free survival rates between the overall laparoscopic and open resection groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is associated with similar complication rates, CRM involvement status, and long-term outcomes as those associated with open surgery but with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Although laparoscopic surgery might necessitate more advanced technical skills, similar long-term oncological results can be obtained with this technique.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume25
dc.identifier.eissn1534-4908
dc.identifier.issn1530-4515
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84928032037
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/13301
dc.identifier.wos352230800018
dc.keywordsRectal cancer
dc.keywordsLaparoscopic surgery
dc.keywordsOpen surgery
dc.keywordsLong-term outcome
dc.keywordsCircumferential resection margin total mesorectal excision
dc.keywordsMrc clasicc trial
dc.keywordsMinimum follow-up
dc.keywordsOpen surgery
dc.keywordsLocal recurrence
dc.keywordsColorectal-carcinoma
dc.keywordsAnterior resection
dc.keywordsOncologic outcomes
dc.keywordsStapling technique
dc.keywordsColon-cancer
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleThe role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorBuğra, Dursun
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files