Publication:
Machine learning prediction of Gleason grade group upgrade between in-bore biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology

dc.contributor.coauthorÖzbozduman, Kaan
dc.contributor.coauthorLoc, İrem
dc.contributor.coauthorDurmaz, Selahattin
dc.contributor.coauthorKılıç, Mert
dc.contributor.coauthorYıldırım, Hakan
dc.contributor.coauthorVural, Metin
dc.contributor.coauthorÜnlü, M. Burçin
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorAtasoy, Duygu
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:39:46Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to enhance the accuracy of Gleason grade group (GG) upgrade prediction in prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent MRI-guided in-bore biopsy (MRGB) and radical prostatectomy (RP) through a combined analysis of prebiopsy and MRGB clinical data. A retrospective analysis of 95 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by MRGB was conducted where all patients had undergone RP. Among the patients, 64.2% had consistent GG results between in-bore biopsies and RP, whereas 28.4% had upgraded and 7.4% had downgraded results. GG1 biopsy results, lower biopsy core count, and fewer positive cores were correlated with upgrades in the entire patient group. In patients with GG>1, larger tumor sizes and fewer biopsy cores were associated with upgrades. By integrating MRGB data with prebiopsy clinical data, machine learning (ML) models achieved 85.6% accuracy in predicting upgrades, surpassing the 64.2% baseline from MRGB alone. ML analysis also highlighted the value of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) for GG>1 patients. Incorporation of MRGB results with tumor size, ADCmin value, number of biopsy cores, positive core count, and Gleason grade can be useful to predict GG upgrade at final pathology and guide patient selection for active surveillance. © The Author(s) 2024.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessGold Open Access
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-024-56415-5
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187164941
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56415-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/23088
dc.identifier.wos1182589300007
dc.keywordsSystem PI-RADS
dc.keywordsCancer
dc.keywordsSpecimens
dc.keywordsOutcomes
dc.keywordsScore
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Research
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports
dc.subjectBiopsy
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImage-guided biopsy
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNeoplasm grading
dc.subjectProstate
dc.subjectProstatectomy
dc.subjectProstatic neoplasms
dc.subjectRetrospective studies
dc.titleMachine learning prediction of Gleason grade group upgrade between in-bore biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorAtasoy, Duygu
local.contributor.kuauthorEsen,Tarık
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR04961.pdf
Size:
2.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format