Publication:
Comparison of earliest and later autobiographical memories in young and middle-aged adults

dc.contributor.coauthorEce, Berivan
dc.contributor.coauthorDemiray, Burcu
dc.contributor.coauthorOner, Sezin
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.kuauthorGülgöz, Sami
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:39:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThe current study examined earliest memories of young and middle-aged adults in comparison to a recent autobiographical memory and a free-report one from any life phase. These three types of memories were compared in terms of their memory characteristics such as vividness, emotionality. importance, confidence, and rehearsal frequency. A total of 319 young (18-30 years) and 112 middle-aged (40-65 years) adults completed the online survey. Results showed that earliest memories were rated either similar to or lower than later memories in their memory characteristics. More specifically. they received lower ratings than free-report memories in all memory characteristics whereas they did not significantly differ from recent memories only in importance and emotionality. In addition, free-report memories were highest in emotionality, importance and rehearsal frequency whereas recent memories were highest in vividness and confidence ratings. Compared to young adults, middle-aged adults provided higher ratings for all memory characteristics in general, and they further recalled earliest memories from an older age. Finally, the order of reporting the three types of memories (earliest memory first versus recent memory first) was examined with respect to its potential influence on memory characteristics and dating of the recalled memories. Results displayed no significant effect of the reporting order on memory characteristics. Dating of the earliest and free-report memories, however, was significantly affected by the reporting order. The mean age for earliest memories was higher when it was retrieved following the recent memory compared to the reporting order in which earliest memories are retrieved and reported first. Overall, results indicated that earliest memories arc not particularly special compared to later memories (e.g.. free-report memories) in terms of their memory characteristics, and they are vulnerable to experimental manipulation such as changing the reporting order just like other types of autobiographical memories.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyTR Dizin
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume39
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/SP2018-0037
dc.identifier.eissn2602-2982
dc.identifier.issn1304-4680
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/SP2018-0037
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/13165
dc.identifier.wos473207300003
dc.keywordsEarliest memory
dc.keywordsAge group differences
dc.keywordsMidlife early-childhood memories
dc.keywordsReminiscence bump
dc.keywordsLife-span
dc.keywordsOld-age
dc.keywordsSelf
dc.keywordsAmnesia
dc.keywordsRecollections
dc.keywordsEvents
dc.keywordsRecall
dc.keywordsTime
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIstanbul Univ, Fac Letters, Dept Psychology
dc.relation.ispartofStudies In Psychology-Psikoloji Calismalari Dergisi
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.titleComparison of earliest and later autobiographical memories in young and middle-aged adults
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorGülgöz, Sami
local.publication.orgunit1College of Social Sciences and Humanities
local.publication.orgunit2Department of Psychology
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794

Files