Publication:
Comparison of staple, anchor, and tenodesis screw for posterior tibialis tendon fixation: a biomechanical analysis

dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorGedik, Cemil Cihad
dc.contributor.kuauthorGünerbüyük, Caner
dc.contributor.kuauthorSarabi, Misagh Rezapour
dc.contributor.kuauthorKılıçoğlu, Önder
dc.contributor.kuauthorAslan, Lercan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:28:22Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractVarious posterior tibialis tendon fixation techniques are described in literature. Suture anchor, staple and tenodesis screws are widely used for posterior tibialis tendon transfer, but their stiffness and the maximal ultimate failure load were not tested before. We aimed to compare the initial ultimate failure load and stiffnesses of suture anchor, staple and tenodesis screws on bovine tendon fixation to bovine metaphyseal bone. Thirty-five fresh bovine ankle joints and hooves were obtained from a local abattoir. Metatarsals bones with long extensor tendons were harvested. Staple group had 15, suture anchor group had 10, and tenodesis screw group had 10 samples. All fixations were tested with Instron® ElectroPuls® E10000 Test Instrument. Ultimate failure load and failure location were noted. Staple group's median ultimate failure load was 210.03 N (IQR: 133.43), suture anchor group's was 124.33 N (IQR: 63.67), and tenodesis screw group's was 394.46 N (IQR:115.09). Median stiffness of the staple group was 19.87 N/m (IQR: 15.29); the tenodesis screw group's was 20.28 N/m (IQR: 6.18), the anchor group's was 8.54 N/m (IQR: 4.35). Staples’ failure occurred on tendon-staple interface, while suture anchors’ occurred on anchor-suture interface and tenodesis screws’ occurred on tendon-suture interface. Tenodesis screws’ ultimate failure load was the highest (tenodesis vs anchor and staple p <.001 and p =.032, respectively). Staple fixation is less expensive than the other methods and can provide sufficient fixation strength but was weaker than the tenodesis screw fixation. Staples are still a good choice for tendon to bone fixation, whereas the suture anchors provide lower fixation strength at a higher cost.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipWe are thankful to Defne Başkurt for the schematic drawings.
dc.description.volume63
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.jfas.2023.10.007
dc.identifier.issn1067-2516
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85179176119
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2023.10.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/25707
dc.identifier.wos1202346300001
dc.keywords5
dc.keywordsAnkle
dc.keywordsBiomechanics
dc.keywordsFoot drop
dc.keywordsPosterior tibialis
dc.keywordsTendon transfer
dc.keywordsTenodesis
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAcademic Press Inc.
dc.relation.grantnoDefne Başkurt
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleComparison of staple, anchor, and tenodesis screw for posterior tibialis tendon fixation: a biomechanical analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorAslan, Lercan
local.contributor.kuauthorGünerbüyük, Caner
local.contributor.kuauthorGedik, Cemil Cihad
local.contributor.kuauthorSarabi, Misagh Rezapour
local.contributor.kuauthorKılıçoğlu, Önder
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit1GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
local.publication.orgunit2Graduate School of Sciences and Engineering
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3fc31c89-e803-4eb1-af6b-6258bc42c3d8
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication434c9663-2b11-4e66-9399-c863e2ebae43
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery434c9663-2b11-4e66-9399-c863e2ebae43

Files