<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Assessment of the VENUSS and GRANT models for individual prediction of cancer-specific survival in surgically treated nonmetastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,
Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,
Item type:Organizational Unit,
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Piccinelli, Mattia L.

Tappero, Stefano

Garcia, Cristina Cano

Barletta, Francesco

Incesu, Reha-Baris

Morra, Simone

Scheipner, Lukas

Tian, Zhe

Luzzago, Stefano

Mistretta, Francesco A.

Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend VENUSS and GRANT models for the prediction of cancer control outcomes after nephrectomy for nonmetastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC).Objective: To test the ability of VENUSS and GRANT models to predict 5-yr cancer specific survival in a North American population.Design, setting, and participants: For this retrospective study, we identified 4184 patients with unilateral surgically treated nonmetastatic pRCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2019).Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The original VENUSS and GRANT risk categories were applied to predict 5-yr cancer-specific survival. A cross-validation method was used to test the accuracy and calibration of the models and to conduct decision curve analyses for the study cohort.Results and limitations: The VENUSS and GRANT categories represented independent predictors of cancer-specific mortality. On cross-validation, the accuracy of the VENUSS and GRANT risk categories was 0.73 and 0.65, respectively. Both models showed good calibration and performed better than random predictions in decision curve analysis. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the absence of a central pathological review.Conclusion: VENUSS risk categories fulfilled prognostic model criteria for predicting cancer-specific survival 5 yr after surgery in North American patients with non-metastatic pRCC as recommended by guidelines. Conversely, GRANT risk categories did not. Thus, VENUSS risk categories represent an important tool for counseling, follow-up planning, and patient selection for appropriate adjuvant trials in pRCC. Patient summary: We tested the ability of two validated methods (VENUSS and GRANT) to predict death due to papillary kidney cancer in a North American pop-ulation. The VENUSS risk categories showed good performance in predicting 5-year cancer-specific survival.& COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Source

Publisher

Elsevier

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

European Urology Open Science

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.005

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Item type:Goal, Access status: Open Access ,
03 - Good Health and Well-being
Over the last 15 years, the number of childhood deaths has been cut in half. This proves that it is possible to win the fight against almost every disease. Still, we are spending an astonishing amount of money and resources on treating illnesses that are surprisingly easy to prevent. The new goal for worldwide Good Health promotes healthy lifestyles, preventive measures and modern, efficient healthcare for everyone.
Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
8
Görüntülenme
19
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators