Publication:
Can we predict whether a man with acute or chronic urinary retention will void after bladder outflow resistance reduction surgery? ICI-RS 2023

dc.contributor.coauthorMalde, Sachin
dc.contributor.coauthorSinha, Sanjay
dc.contributor.coauthorSahai, Arun
dc.contributor.coauthorPerrouin-Verbe, Marie-Aimee
dc.contributor.coauthorHashim, Hashim
dc.contributor.coauthorAgro, Enrico Finazzi
dc.contributor.coauthorWein, Alan
dc.contributor.coauthorAbrams, Paul
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorAcar, Ömer
dc.contributor.kuauthorTarcan, Tufan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:39:10Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAims To address the predictive factors of a successful voiding after bladder outflow resistance reduction surgery (BORRS) in men presenting with acute or chronic urinary retention (UR).MethodsA think tank (TT) of ICI-RS was gathered in 2023, Bristol, UK, to discuss several aspects of the problem, such as the pathophysiology of UR, the clinical and urodynamic evaluation of men with UR and whether it is possible to predict which men will be able to successfully void after treatment with contemporary surgical options.ResultsThe TT agreed that successful voiding after BORRS depends on several factors but that a strong recommendation cannot be made regarding preoperative evaluation and whether there are predictive factors of success because of the heterogeneity of patients and methodology in published trials. The diagnosis of obstruction in men with UR may be challenging when there is apparent reduced detrusor contraction during urodynamic studies. Even in the absence of bladder contractility there is documentation of such cases that have voided adequately after BORRS. Still, detrusor underactivity and inadequate relief of prostatic obstruction are the main causes of an unsuccessful voiding after BORRS. Conventional resection and enucleation methods remain the most successful surgeries in relieving UR in men, whereas the efficacy of minimally invasive surgical treatments needs to be assessed further.ConclusionResearch is needed to understand the pathophysiology of UR and the predictors of successful voiding after different types of BORRS in men with UR.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.openaccess 
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorship 
dc.description.volume43
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.25404
dc.identifier.eissn1520-6777
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.link 
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85184215672
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25404
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22920
dc.identifier.wos1152740600001
dc.keywordsBladder
dc.keywordsObstruction
dc.keywordsProstate
dc.keywordsRetention
dc.keywordsSurgery
dc.keywordsUrodynamics
dc.keywordsVoiding
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.grantno 
dc.relation.ispartofNeurourology and Urodynamics
dc.rights 
dc.subjectUrology and nephrology
dc.titleCan we predict whether a man with acute or chronic urinary retention will void after bladder outflow resistance reduction surgery? ICI-RS 2023
dc.typeReview
dc.type.other 
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTarcan, Tufan
local.contributor.kuauthorAcar, Ömer
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files