Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms of the bile ducts: identity, clinicopathologic characteristics, and differential diagnosis of a distinct entity among intraductal tumors

Abstract

Among the mass-forming preinvasive (tumoral intraepithelial) neoplasms of the biliary tract, intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasms (ITPN-Bs) are increasingly being recognized as a separate category. By being intramucosal polypoid proliferations of dysplastic/neoplastic cells, they are highly similar to other members of the “intraductal neoplasms (IDNs)” category (namely, intraductal papillary neoplasms [IPNBs], and intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms [IOPNs]); however, they are distinguished by MUC6-expressing nonmucinous cells that lack intestinal differentiation and form striking tubular configuration. Their molecular/genetic profile is also proving to be different with frequent alterations in cell cycle and chromatin remodeling genes, which are quite uncommon in other IDNs and cholangiocarcinomas. Despite the conceptual overlaps, they are also very different from intracholecystic nonmucinous tubular neoplasms (ICTN) of the gallbladder with the latter being associated with Wnt/beta-catenin pathway alterations, and almost never invasive. In contrast, ITPN-Bs are invasive in an estimated 80% of the cases, although even invasive examples often exhibit a protracted course. Invasive carcinomas arising from ITPN-Bs are overall similar to cholangiocarcinomas (including small duct and large duct patterns) but also often have peculiar characteristics such as more nodular-compact (blunt invasion) pattern. Like other IDNs, the ITPN-Bs have also been classified in the past as intraductal-spreading type of cholangiocarcinomas (and they are still regarded as such in some publications). In small biopsies, they are prone to be mistaken as ordinary adenocarcinomas because of their tubular pattern and pancreatobiliary cytology although their relatively monotonous cytology and zones of back-to-back tubule formation can help in their correct identification. Clinical presentation of ITPN-Bs is generally similar to other intraductal neoplasms; however, in the intrahepatic component, they tend to be more nodular than cystic, and their snake-like intraductal growth pattern is often more striking. In the management (diagnosis and treatment) of these tumors that are in essence adenoma-carcinoma sequence, the invasive and noninvasive components ought to be evaluated separately. Minimally invasive examples are commonly curable, and even those more extensively invasive may have a surprisingly good prognosis. In summary, biliary ITPNs form a distinct category not only clinicopathologically, immunophenotypically, and molecular-wise but regarding their biological behavior as well.