Publication:
Comparative analysis of next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry in MSI/MMR testing

Thumbnail Image

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit
Organizational Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Objective: Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression, assessed via immunohistochemistry (IHC), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status, determined through molecular methods, are two tumor-agnostic predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy eligibility. However, there remains no consensus on the preferred testing method, nor on the type and extent of molecular testing required for optimal patient selection. This study investigates the correlation between MMR protein loss detected by IHC and MSI status identified through next-generation sequencing (NGS) to evaluate the concordance and potential complementary roles of these methods. Material and Methods: A total of 139 tumor samples were analyzed for MSI using NGS. The cohort included colorectal carcinoma (n=51), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n=22), cholangiocarcinoma (n=9), non-small cell lung carcinoma (n=6), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n=6), gastric adenocarcinoma (n=6), high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (n=5), and 34 other tumor types. IHC was performed to assess MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 protein expression. The correlation between MSI status and MMR protein loss was evaluated. Results: Twelve tumors (8.6%) were classified as MSI-High (microsatellite instable). Among them, ten exhibited MMR protein loss, whereas two MSI-High tumors (a mucinous adenocarcinoma of omental origin and a mucinous colon adenocarcinoma) retained MMR protein expression. No MMR-deficient tumors were identified as MSI-Low (microsatellite stable/MSS). Conclusion: A strong correlation exists between IHC-based MMR loss and NGS-based MSI detection. IHC remains widely used due to its accessibility and cost-effectiveness, whereas NGS offers higher accuracy and broader genomic insights. With its ability to detect multiple alterations simultaneously, NGS is particularly valuable when tissue is scarce. Combining both methods can improve diagnostic accuracy and guide optimal immunotherapy selection.

Source

Publisher

Federation of Turkish Pathology Societies

Subject

Medicine

Citation

Has Part

Source

Turk Patoloji Dergisi

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.5146/tjpath.2025.14079

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

CC BY (Attribution)

Copyrights Note

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as CC BY (Attribution)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

1

Downloads

View PlumX Details