Publication:
Differences in excess mortality by recipient sex after heart transplant: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Thumbnail Image

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Vinson, Amanda J.
Zhang, Xun
Dahhou, Mourad
Döhler, Bernd
Melk, Anette
Sapir-Pichhadze, Ruth
Cardinal, Heloise
Wong, Germaine
Francis, Anna
Pilmore, Helen

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background: Identification of differences in mortality risk between female and male heart transplant recipients may prompt sex-specific management strategies. Because worldwide, males of all ages have higher absolute mortality rates than females, we aimed to compare the excess risk of mortality (risk above the general population) in female vs male heart transplant recipients. Methods: We used relative survival models conducted separately in SRTR and CTS cohorts from 1988–2019, and subsequently combined using 2-stage individual patient data meta-analysis, to compare the excess risk of mortality in female vs male first heart transplant recipients, accounting for the modifying effects of donor sex and recipient current age. Results: We analyzed 108,918 patients. When the donor was male, female recipients 0–12 years (Relative excess risk (RER) 1.13, 95% CI 1.00–1.26), 13–44 years (RER 1.17, 95% CI 1.10–1.25), and ≥45 years (RER 1.14, 95% CI 1.02–1.27) showed higher excess mortality risks than male recipients of the same age. When the donor was female, only female recipients 13–44 years showed higher excess risks of mortality than males (RER 1.09, 95% CI 1.00–1.20), though not significantly (p = 0.05). Conclusions: In the setting of a male donor, female recipients of all ages had significantly higher excess mortality than males. When the donor was female, female recipients of reproductive age had higher excess risks of mortality than male recipients of the same age, though this was not statistically significant. Further investigation is required to determine the reasons underlying these differences. © 2024 The Authors

Source

Publisher

Elsevier Inc.

Subject

Cardiac and cardiovascular systems, Respiratory system, Surgery, Transplantation

Citation

Has Part

Source

Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.healun.2024.03.016

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

7

Views

7

Downloads

View PlumX Details