Publication:
Effects of obesity on the perioperative results and continence status in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

dc.contributor.coauthorKaygısız, Onur
dc.contributor.coauthorÖzmerdiven, Çağdaş Gökhun
dc.contributor.coauthorVuruşkan, Berna Aytaç
dc.contributor.coauthorCoşkun, Burhan
dc.contributor.coauthorGünseren, Kadir Ömür
dc.contributor.coauthorYavaşçaoğlu, İsmet
dc.contributor.coauthorVuruşkan, Hakan
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorKordan, Yakup
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid157552
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T13:13:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the effects of obesity on the surgical success and perioperative results and continence status in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Materials and Methods: The results of 300 consecutive patients undergoing LRP between April 2004 and January 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty patients were excluded from the study, thus, 280 patients remained. The patients were separated into 3 groups according to their body mass index. Based on this classification, group 1 (< 25 kg/m(2)) was normal, group 2 (25- 30 kg/m(2)) was overweight, and group 3 (> 30 kg/m(2)) was obese. The demographic data, intraoperative results, pathological results, and states of continence were compared among the groups. Results: There were 81 patients in group 1, 152 patients in group 2, and 47 patients in group 3. There were no significant differences when the groups were compared according to age and prostate specific antigen values. The intraoperative blood loss was high in group 3 only. Moreover, the estimated blood loss, transfusion, operative time, bilateral nerve- sparing rate, hospitalization days, and complication rate were similar between the groups. There were no significant differences when the pathological results were compared according to the positive surgical margins and Gleason scores. Although the continence rates in group 3 were significantly low 6 months after the operation (p< 0.05), the results were similar at 1 year (p= 0.738). Conclusion: LRP can be applied confidently in obese patients as well as normal and overweight patients.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher Version
dc.description.volume4
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/jus.1699
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR01266
dc.identifier.issn2148-9580
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.4274/jus.1699
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2932
dc.identifier.wos419241900005
dc.keywordsBody mass index
dc.keywordsLaparoscopic surgery
dc.keywordsObesity
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherGalenos Yayınevi
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/3339
dc.sourceJournal of Urological Surgery
dc.subjectUrology and nephrology
dc.subjectProstatectomy
dc.titleEffects of obesity on the perioperative results and continence status in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-9947-848X
local.contributor.kuauthorKordan, Yakup

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3339.pdf
Size:
93.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format