Publication: Capitalist development and civil war
dc.contributor.coauthor | N/A | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of International Relations | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of International Relations | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Mousseau, Michael | |
dc.contributor.kuprofile | Faculty Member | |
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | College of Administrative Sciences and Economics | |
dc.contributor.yokid | N/A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-09T23:03:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.description.abstract | Mousseau, Michael. (2012) Capitalist Development and Civil War. International Studies Quarterly, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00734.x ?(c) 2012 International Studies Association Capitalism has emerged as a force for peace in studies of interstate conflict. Is capitalism also a force for peace within nations? This article shows how a market-capitalist economyone where most citizens normally obtain their livelihoods contracting in the marketcreates citizen-wide preferences for universal freedom, peace, and the democratic rule of law. Prior research has corroborated the theorys predictions linking market-capitalism with liberal preferences, human rights, and peace among nations. Here, Granger tests of causality show that market-capitalism causes higher income, but higher income does not cause market-capitalism, and from 1961 to 2001 not a single civil war, insurgency, or rebellion occurred in any nation with a market-capitalist economy. Market-capitalism is the strongest variable in the civil conflict literature, and many of the most robust relationships in this literature are spuriousincluding income, state capacity, and oil-export dependency. | |
dc.description.indexedby | WoS | |
dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
dc.description.issue | 3 | |
dc.description.openaccess | YES | |
dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
dc.description.volume | 56 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00734.x | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1468-2478 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-8833 | |
dc.identifier.quartile | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84865974789 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00734.x | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/8436 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 308406200003 | |
dc.keywords | Democratic peace | |
dc.keywords | Resource rents | |
dc.keywords | State capacity | |
dc.keywords | Conflict | |
dc.keywords | Contract | |
dc.keywords | Dataset | |
dc.keywords | Society | |
dc.keywords | Rights | |
dc.keywords | Roots | |
dc.keywords | Onset | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | |
dc.source | International Studies Quarterly | |
dc.subject | International relations | |
dc.subject | Political science | |
dc.title | Capitalist development and civil war | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.authorid | 0000-0002-7996-4595 | |
local.contributor.kuauthor | Mousseau, Michael | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126 |