Publication:
Omalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?

dc.contributor.coauthorBaşkan, Emel Bülbül
dc.contributor.coauthorKüçük, Özlem Su
dc.contributor.coauthorÖzdemir, Mustafa
dc.contributor.coauthorÖrnek, Sinem
dc.contributor.coauthorCan, Pelin Kuteyla
dc.contributor.coauthorHasal, Eda
dc.contributor.coauthorEngin, Burhan
dc.contributor.coauthorAtakan, Nilgün
dc.contributor.coauthorAlpsoy, Erkan
dc.contributor.kuauthorKocatürk Göncü, Özgür Emek
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid217219
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:41:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is characterized by recurrent wheals and/or angioedema for longer than 6-weeks. Guidelines recommend Omalizumab (Oma) as first-line and Cyclosporine-A (Cs-A) as second-line treatment in antihistamine resistant CSU. This step-wise algorithm might be time-consuming and costly. Objective: to determine indicators of response to Oma or Cs-A in CSU patients. Methods: we retrospectively analyzed data from seven centers in Turkey; the inclusion criteria for patients were to receive both Oma and Cs-A treatment (not concurrently) at some point in time during their follow-up. Clinical and laboratory features were compared between groups. Results: among 110 CSU patients; 47 (42.7%) were Oma-responders, 15 (13.6%) were Cs-A-responders, and 24 (21.8%) were both Oma and Cs-A responders and 24 (21.8%) were non-responders to either drug. High CRP levels were more frequent in Cs-A-responders (72.7% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.055). Oma-responders had higher baseline UCT (Urticaria Control Test) scores (6 vs. 4.5; p = 0.045). Responders to both drugs had less angioedema and higher baseline UCT scores compared to other groups (33.3% vs. 62.8%; p = 0.01 and 8 vs. 5; p = 0.017). Non-responders to both drugs had an increased frequency in the female gender and lower baseline UCT scores compared to other groups (87.5% vs. 61.6%; p = 0.017 and 5 vs. 7; p = 0.06). Study Limitations: retrospective nature, limited number of patients, no control group, the lack of the basophil activation (BAT) or BHRA (basophil histamine release assay) tests. Conclusions: baseline disease activity assessment, which considers the presence of angioedema and disease activity scores, gender, and CRP levels might be helpful to predict treatment outcomes in CSU patients and to choose the right treatment for each patient. Categorizing patients into particular endotypes could provide treatment optimization and increase treatment success.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume97
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.abd.2022.03.003
dc.identifier.eissn1806-4841
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR04066
dc.identifier.issn0365-0596
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2022.03.003
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134262805
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2265
dc.identifier.wos882887400005
dc.keywordsBiomarker
dc.keywordsChronic urticaria
dc.keywordsCyclosporine
dc.keywordsOmalizumab
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/10947
dc.sourceAnais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.titleOmalizumab versus cyclosporin-A for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: can we define better-responding endotypes?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-2801-0959
local.contributor.kuauthorKocatürk Göncü, Özgür Emek

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10947.pdf
Size:
882.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format