Publication:
Biochemical or clinical pregnancy loss after first embryo transfer does not affect subsequent transfer outcome

dc.contributor.coauthorBarrett, Francesca
dc.contributor.coauthorVessa, Blake
dc.contributor.coauthorMargolis, Cheri
dc.contributor.coauthorWhitehead, Christine
dc.contributor.coauthorWerner, Marie
dc.contributor.coauthorSeli, Emre
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorKalafat, Erkan
dc.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T07:28:53Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractResearch question: Does biochemical or clinical pregnancy loss after frozen embryo transfer (FET) increase the odds of pregnancy loss in a subsequent transfer? Design: Retrospective cohort study evaluating patients who underwent two consecutive single FETs using either euploid or untested embryos at a university-affiliated fertility centre between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients who had experienced a biochemical or clinical pregnancy loss after the first FET were compared with those who had experienced implantation failure in the subsequent FET. Results: Among 2103 patients who underwent two consecutive euploid FETs, those who had experienced a biochemical loss after their first euploid FET had a subsequent biochemical loss rate of 9.9% and a clinical loss rate of 10.5% in their second euploid FET. These rates did not significantly differ from those who had experienced previous implantation failure (9.6%, P = 0.890
dc.description.abstract10.9%, P = 0.556, respectively). Similarly, among patients who had experienced a clinical loss in their first euploid FET, rates of biochemical and clinical loss in the second euploid transfer were comparable to those who had experienced previous implantation failure (11.5% versus 9.6%, P = 0.272
dc.description.abstractand 12.5% versus 10.9%, P = 0.456, respectively). These findings remained consistent when analysing untested (n = 282) FETs, with no significant differences in subsequent pregnancy loss rates between patients who had experienced previous pregnancy loss and those who had experienced implantation failure. Conclusions: Biochemical or clinical pregnancy loss after a euploid or untested FET is not associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss in the subsequent transfer.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105435
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6491
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1472-6483
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pubmed41819682
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105033819677
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105435
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/32968
dc.identifier.volume52
dc.identifier.wos001716579700001
dc.keywordsBiochemical pregnancy loss
dc.keywordsClinical pregnancy loss
dc.keywordsIVF
dc.keywordsEmbryo transfer
dc.keywordsImplantation failure
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofReproductive BioMedicine Online
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectObstetrics
dc.subjectGynecology
dc.subjectReproductive biology
dc.titleBiochemical or clinical pregnancy loss after first embryo transfer does not affect subsequent transfer outcome
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files