Publication: LENGTHENING PROCEDURES IN PEYRONIE'S DISEASE: ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE IN TERMS OF EDUCATIONAL CONTENT
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Kilic, M.
Madendere, S.
Gungor, H. S.
Tarcan, T.
Publication Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
No
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Objectives: In patients with complex and severe penile curvature due to Peyronie’s disease, the standard recommended
method is plaque incision/excision
+ grafting (PIG/PEG) also
known as lengthening procedures. In this study, we aimed to
evaluate the lengthening procedures for Peyronie’s disease on
YouTube in terms of educational content.
Methods: A comprehensive search was carried out using
the keywords “Peyronie’s disease surgery, penile curvature
surgery, plaque incision/excision, and grafting” on YouTube.
Only videos of PIG and PEG methods were included in the
study. Videos for penile implantation, penile plication, and
extratunical grafting methods were excluded. The remaining videos were evaluated by 3 urology specialists using an
assessment tool developed for this study. The tool comprised
three parts: preoperative evaluation, intraoperative steps, and
audiovisual evaluation, totaling 18 items. Each item was
scored from 0 to 2 as “not presented”, “partially presented”
and “completely presented”, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for interrater reliability analyses.
Results: A total of 30 videos were analyzed. The median video
length was 457 seconds (IQR = 223-579). Based on the ICC
analysis, the agreement between raters was either good or
excellent (ICC> 0.75) for all items. Surgical characteristics
are summarized in Table 1. Table 2 represents the video
assessment and mean scores of each item. In the preoperative
evaluation, only deformity characteristics were well demonstrated, while patient characteristics, information on penile
length, and erectile status were insufficient. Intraoperative
steps were generally well demonstrated, and the best stages
were the plaque incision/excision, and deformity control with
erection testing. On the other hand, suture materials and
the closure and dressing stages of the surgery were generally
neglected. The audiovisual evaluation showed that while the
resolution and angle of the videos were generally good, the
language used in the videos was often inadequate.
Conclusions: Intraoperative steps are mostly well covered in
PIG/PEG surgery videos on YouTube. The addition of preoperative evaluation and the use of appropriate, understandable
language in the videos will increase the educational nature of
the videos.
Source
Publisher
Oxford Univ Press
Subject
Urology & Nephrology
Citation
Has Part
Source
Journal of sexual medicine
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf077.145
