Publication:
Treatment patterns and oncological outcomes of older adults with metastatic prostate cancer in real-world setting

dc.contributor.coauthorWenzel, Mike
dc.contributor.coauthorHoeh, Benedikt
dc.contributor.coauthorWagner, Nele
dc.contributor.coauthorKoll, Florestan
dc.contributor.coauthorSiech, Carolin
dc.contributor.coauthorHumke, Clara
dc.contributor.coauthorSteuber, Thomas
dc.contributor.coauthorGraefen, Markus
dc.contributor.coauthorKluth, Luis
dc.contributor.coauthorTraumann, Miriam
dc.contributor.coauthorBanek, Severine
dc.contributor.coauthorChun, Felix K. H.
dc.contributor.coauthorMandel, Philipp
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:38:38Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: The landscape of systemic therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) extensively improved within the last decades resulting in a significantly prolonged overall survival. However, subgroup analyses of phase III trials suggest potentially different overall survival outcomes for older adults. Methods: We relied on our institutional metastatic prostate cancer database to identify mHSPC and subsequently mCRPC patients. Older adults were stratified according to age groups 70-74 versus >= 75-79 versus >= 80 years at metastatic occurrence. Subsequently, uni- and multivariable time to mCRPC and overall survival analyses were performed. Results: Of 494 older adults, 217 (44%) were 70-74 versus 180 (36%) 75-79 versus 97 (20%) >= 80 years old. Rates of local prostate cancer treatment differed significantly between all three groups (p < 0.01). Regarding mHSPC treatment, androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) were administered in 30-39% of patients and docetaxel with 9% in age group 70-74 years and 6% and 3% in age groups 75-79 years and >= 80 years. Regarding mCRPC treatment, significant differences between treatment proportions were observed (p < 0.01). Most common treatment was ARSI for all three groups. Conversely, chemotherapy was more frequently administered in patients aged 70-74 (16%), relative to 4% and 3% in 75-79 year and >= 80 year aged patients. In univariable and multivariable time to mCRPC analyses, overall survival in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC analyses, no significant differences between all three age groups were observed (all p >= 0.3). Conclusions: Treatment patterns differ significantly between older adults with metastatic prostate cancer. However, these differences may not result in differences of overall life expectancy.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue9
dc.description.openaccesshybrid
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorsThis study was part of the EPIC-REAP project (Enhancing Prostate cancer care In Germany Combining Real-world data And AI for Enhanced Analysis and Precision) supported by the Mildred-Scheel Nachwuchszentrum Frankfurt. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
dc.description.volume72
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgs.19045
dc.identifier.eissn1532-5415
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85196784544
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19045
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22761
dc.identifier.wos1254223700001
dc.keywordsDe novo
dc.keywordsmCRPC
dc.keywordsmCSPC
dc.keywordsSurvival
dc.keywordsMetastatic prostate cancer
dc.keywordsmHSPC
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
dc.subjectGeriatrics
dc.subjectGerontology
dc.titleTreatment patterns and oncological outcomes of older adults with metastatic prostate cancer in real-world setting
dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR04796.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format