Publication:
Nutritional status and surgical outcomes in patients with esophageal atresia: findings from Turkish Esophageal Atresia Registry

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Soyer, Tutku
Bostanci, Suleyman Arif
Durakbasa, Cigdem Ulukaya
Ozcan, Coskun
Ciftci, Ilhan
Gollu, Gulnur
Parlak, Ayse
Kuzu, Emine Burcu Cigsar
Demirel, Berat Dilek
Akkoyun, Ibrahim

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the relationship between nutritional status and surgical outcomes in patients with esophageal atresia (EA) from the Turkish Esophageal Atresia Registry (TEAR). Methods Between 2015 and 2024, 713 patients with the complete data of neonatal period and first year of life were included. According to FENTON, growth charts and patients were grouped as small for gestational age (SGA, < 10 percentiles), medium SGA (percentiles = 10-20), appropriate for gestational age (AGA, percentiles = 20-90) and large for gestational age (LGA, percentiles > 90) at birth. The z scores for height-for-weight were reevaluated at 6th and 12th months of age. Results Among 713 patients, 56% were boys. 23.7% of patients were SGA. There was no difference among groups for demographic features, outcomes, and mortality (p > 0.05). Patients with SGA had a higher rate of karyotype anomalies (23.1%, p < 0.05). At the 6th month, 20% of patients had improved nutritional status, 46.2% unchanged, and 33.5% worsened. At the 12th month, it was 31.6%, 50.2%, and 18.3%, respectively. 32.8% of the SGA patients had severe malnutrition at the 6th month, while this rate decreased to 10.2% at the end of the first year of life. Patients with worsened nutritional status had a significantly higher rate of mortality (10.2%) than patients with unchanged and improved nutritional status (3.7%, 2%, respectively, p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between nutritional status and surgical outcomes at the 6th and 12th months (p > 0.05). Conclusions The incidence of SGA was significantly higher in EA patients with karyotype anomalies. While 20% of patients improved nutritional status at the 6th month, only one-third of patients improved nutritional status at the end of the first year. Closer follow-up is needed in patients with EA to avoid malnutrition, which can lead to poor growth, developmental delay, and impaired immune function.

Source

Publisher

SPRINGER

Subject

Pediatrics, Surgery

Citation

Has Part

Source

Pediatric Surgery International

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1007/s00383-025-06216-2

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)

Copyrights Note

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details