Publication:
Pitfalls in the use of whole slide imaging for the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: a pilot study in surgical neuropathology

dc.contributor.coauthorPekmezci M.
dc.contributor.coauthorTihan T.
dc.contributor.coauthorLee H. S.
dc.contributor.kuauthorUysal, Sanem Pınar
dc.contributor.kuauthorOrhan, Yelda Ceren
dc.contributor.kuprofileUndergraduate Student
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:40:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground: Whole slide imaging (WSI) finds increasingly higher value in everyday surgical pathology in addition to its well-established use for educational and research purposes. However, its diagnostic utility, especially in subspecialty settings such as neuropathology, is not fully validated. Neuropathology practice is unique with smaller overall tissue size and frequent need for high-power evaluation. In addition, tumor grade is an integral part of the initial diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of primary pathology diagnosis of surgical neuropathology specimens using WSI. Materials and Methods: We reviewed consecutive surgical neuropathology cases diagnosed in our institution during a 2-month period and identified a single diagnostic slide, which was scanned at 40× magnification. Two neuropathologists who were blinded to the original diagnoses reviewed the whole slide image and rendered a diagnosis including tumor grade when applicable. They reviewed the single diagnostic slide after a wash-out period. Intra- and inter-observer discrepancies, as well as reasons for discrepancies, were evaluated. Results: The concordance rates were 94.9% and 88% for two neuropathologists. Two critical issues leading to discrepancies were identified: (1) identification of mitoses and (2) recognition of nuclear details. Conclusions: Given the current study is exclusively for surgical neuropathology cases, an all-encompassing conclusion about the utility of WSI for diagnostic purposes may not be available. Nevertheless, pathologists should be aware of the potential pitfalls due to identification of mitotic figures and nuclear details. We recommend independent validation for each subspecialty of pathology to identify subspecialty-specific concerns, so they can be properly addressed. © 2016 Journal of Pathology Informatics | Published by Wolters Kluwer -Medknow.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume7
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/2153-3539.181769
dc.identifier.eissn2153-3539
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR00506
dc.identifier.issn2229-5089
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.181769
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009266890
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2221
dc.keywordsCentral nervous system tumors
dc.keywordsDigital pathology
dc.keywordsWhole slide imaging
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherMedknow Publications
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/572
dc.sourceJournal of Pathology Informatics
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectNeuropathology
dc.titlePitfalls in the use of whole slide imaging for the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: a pilot study in surgical neuropathology
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorUysal, Sanem Pınar
local.contributor.kuauthorOrhan, Yelda Ceren

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
572.pdf
Size:
362.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format