Publication:
Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Acute, Chronic, and Remote Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Patil, Shiv
Karabacak, Mert
Aydin, Serhat
Sagi, Inna
Soddu, Andrea
Ozkara, Burak Berksu
Margetis, Konstantinos
Bisdas, Sotirios

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a global health concern that remains difficult to clinically evaluate due to variable diagnostic criteria and a lack of objective biomarkers. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been shown to be a sensitive measure of microstructural injury caused by head injury that cannot be visualized by conventional neuroimaging, which may potentially aid in the diagnosis and prognosis of mTBI. This review seeks to evaluate the available literature concerning the role of DTI in evaluating microstructural alterations in white matter (WM) associated with mTBI. An initial systematic search from PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus yielded 1507 articles published between 2007 and 2024. A total of 79 studies met the full eligibility criteria for inclusion in this qualitative synthesis. The majority of studies demonstrated DTI abnormalities in the setting of acute, chronic, and remote mTBI, predominantly in the WM tracts of the corpus callosum, corona radiata, internal capsule, and longitudinal fasciculus. Many studies identified associations between DTI parameters and clinical measures of mTBI, such as cognitive performance, executive functioning, and comorbidities, including post-concussion syndrome and post-traumatic stress disorder. Overall, the weight of evidence in this review supports the cautious integration of DTI in the clinical assessment of mTBI. The observed discrepancies reported in the literature on DTI may be explained by significant variability in study design, analytical technique, and measured clinical outcomes. Further research that implements consistent methodology is crucial to fully realize the use of DTI as an imaging biomarker of mTBI.

Source

Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc

Subject

Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Neurology, Neurosciences

Citation

Has Part

Source

Journal of neurotrauma

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1177/08977151251363258

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details