Publication:
Comparison of 1-year morbidity following liver transplant for acute alcoholic hepatitis versus alcoholic cirrhosis

dc.contributor.coauthorOzbek, Umut
dc.contributor.coauthorLiu, Jack
dc.contributor.coauthorFigueredo, Carlos
dc.contributor.coauthorChacko, Kristina R.
dc.contributor.coauthorTow, Clara
dc.contributor.coauthorReinus, John F.
dc.contributor.coauthorKinkhabwala, Milan
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorAndaçoğlu, Oya Münevver
dc.contributor.kuprofileDoctor
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteN/A
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:42:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjectives: With limited data on the morbidity profile of liver transplant as therapy for alcoholic hepatitis, we compared 30- day and 1-year morbidity in liver transplant recipients with alcoholic hepatitis versus alcoholic cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 38 perioperative variables in patients with alcoholic hepatitis (n = 15) and with alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 46). Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors independently associated with outcomes. Results: Patients with alcoholic hepatitis were younger (43 vs 58 years; P =.001), with higher pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (36 vs 29; P =.009) and worse Karnofsky scores (20 vs 50; P<.001). All patients with alcoholic hepatitis received standard criteria deceased donor grafts; however, in the alcoholic cirrhosis group, 64% received standard criteria deceased, 11% living, 11% after cardiac death, 9% extended criteria, and 2% split graft donor organ donations (P > .05). The alcoholic hepatitis group had higher degree of steatosis on explant (P < .005), and the alcoholic cirrhosis group had higher 30-day reoperation rate (P = .001); however, 1-year interventions, vascular and biliary complications, graft and patient survival, and all other variables were similar (P > .05). Rates of alcohol relapse, 1-year infection, and 1-year rejection were higher but not significant (P > .05) in the alcoholic hepatitis group. Thirty-day reoperation (odds ratio of 82.63; 95% CI, 8.02-3338.96; P = .002) and Karnofsky scores (odds ratio of 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.36; P = .006) remained significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our results showed significant differences between our patient groups, including worse functional status in the alcoholic hepatitis group but significantly higher 30-day reoperation rates and more variable grafts in the alcoholic cirrhosis group, although both groups had similar overall 1-year complication and survival rates. Although not significant, patients with alcoholic hepatitis had higher alcohol relapse and 1-year infection and rejection rates. A larger cohort is necessary to confirm the strength of these findings.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.volume19
dc.identifier.doi10.6002/ect.2020.0189
dc.identifier.eissn2146-8427
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85106515772
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.6002/ect.2020.0189
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/13288
dc.identifier.wos647569000007
dc.keywordsAlcoholic liver disease
dc.keywordsFunctional status
dc.keywordsSurgical morbidity
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBaskent Univ
dc.sourceExperimental and Clinical Transplantation
dc.subjectTransplantation
dc.titleComparison of 1-year morbidity following liver transplant for acute alcoholic hepatitis versus alcoholic cirrhosis
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.kuauthorAndaçoğlu, Oya Münevver

Files