Publication:
Measuring ICD-11 dissociative identity disorder: Cross-cultural validation of the international dissociative identity disorder questionnaire

dc.contributor.coauthorFung, Hong Wang
dc.contributor.coauthorChau, Anson Kai Chun
dc.contributor.coauthorRoss, Colin A.
dc.contributor.coauthorSar, Vedat
dc.contributor.coauthorDerin, Gorkem
dc.contributor.coauthorAkis, Asli Dila
dc.contributor.coauthorChiu, Henry Tak Shing
dc.contributor.coauthorZatopek, Audrey
dc.contributor.coauthorHo, Grace Wing Ka
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-31T08:22:30Z
dc.date.available2025-12-31
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractRecently, the ICD-11 has updated the diagnostic requirements for dissociative identity disorder (DID) and introduced partial DID as a new diagnosis. This study validated the first measure of DID and partial DID as defined in ICD-11. Two convenience samples of mental health service users (118 Chinese speakers and 115 English speakers) completed the International Dissociative Identity Disorder Questionnaire (IDIDQ), the Dissociative Experiences Scale-Taxon (DES-T), and the Multiscale Dissociation Inventory (MDI) in their respective language. The IDIDQ had good to excellent internal consistency (alpha =.861 to.892) and test-retest reliability (ICC =.682 to.854, p < .001) in both samples. The 3-factor structure of DID (i.e., amnesia, dissociative identities, and switching), as proposed in ICD-11, was supported by our cross-cultural data, with configural, metric and scalar invariance established across the Chinese- and English-speaking samples. The IDIDQ reliably detected probable ICD-11 DID and partial DID (kappa =.517 to.781, p < .001) during a one-week test-retest period. The IDIDQ subscales were strongly correlated with the respective MDI subscales and the DES-T scores. The IDIDQ results had moderate to substantial agreement with the MDI Identity Dissociation subscale and the DES-T in both samples (kappa =.514 to.741, p < .001). This study provides first evidence showing the ICD-11 DID and partial DID can be reliably and validly measured using the IDIDQ.
dc.description.fulltextYes
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104685
dc.identifier.eissn1876-2026
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1876-2018
dc.identifier.pubmed40934746
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104685
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/31663
dc.identifier.volume112
dc.identifier.wos001571324300001
dc.keywordsDissociative identity disorder (DID)
dc.keywordsPartial DID
dc.keywordsDissociative Disorders
dc.keywordsSelf-report
dc.keywordsCross-cultural psychiatry
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Journal of Psychiatry
dc.relation.openaccessYes
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.titleMeasuring ICD-11 dissociative identity disorder: Cross-cultural validation of the international dissociative identity disorder questionnaire
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files