Publication:
Urinary biomarkers in children with neurogenic and non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.coauthorSekerci, Cagri Akin
dc.contributor.coauthorYucel, Selcuk
dc.contributor.kuauthorTarcan, Tufan
dc.contributor.researchcenter 
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unit 
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:39:10Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractAim The aim of this systematic review is to assess urinary biomarkers studied in children with neurogenic and non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).Materials and MethodsThe systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The screening was performed on PUBMED without any publication date limitation. Only original articles were included. Parameters related to the following topics were obtained: study design, characteristics of participants, number of participants, age, control group, types of biomarkers, measurement technique in urine, subgroup analysis, urodynamic findings, and outcome. Dutch Cochrane Checklist (DCC) and level of evidence by EBRO platform were used for quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed with the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 4 program.ResultsA total of 494 studies were screened and 16 studies were included. 11 (68.75%) were conducted in children with non-neurogenic LUTD and 5 (31.25%) neurogenic LUTD. Nerve growth factor (NGF) was evaluated in 12 studies, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in 5, Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) in 2, transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF Beta-1) in 2, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in 1, and Aquaporin-2 in 1. According to DCC, 10 (62.5%) articles were evaluated on 4 (37.5%) items and 4 articles on 5 items. The average score was 3.91+/-0.56. The level of evidence was found as B for 13 (81.25%) articles and C for 3 (18.75%). In meta-analysis, urinary NGF levels in children with non-neurogenic LUTS were significantly higher than in the healthy control group (Hedges's g = 1.867, standard error = 0.344, variance = 0.119, p = 0.0001).ConclusionUrinary biomarkers are promising for the future with their noninvasive features. However, prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better understand the potential of urinary biomarkers to reflect urodynamic and clinical findings in children with LUTD.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.openaccess 
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsors 
dc.description.volume43
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.25382
dc.identifier.eissn1520-6777
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467
dc.identifier.link 
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85182424353
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25382
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22924
dc.identifier.wos1144384800001
dc.keywordsBrain-derived neurotrophic factor
dc.keywordsChildren
dc.keywordsNeurogenic bladder
dc.keywordsNerve growth factor
dc.keywordsOveractive bladder
dc.keywordsUrinary biomarkers
dc.keywordsUrodynamics
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.grantno 
dc.rights 
dc.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamics
dc.subjectUrology and nephrology
dc.titleUrinary biomarkers in children with neurogenic and non-neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeReview
dc.type.other 
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTarcan, Tufan

Files