Publication:
Human cognitive closure and mysterianism: reply to Kriegel

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophy
dc.contributor.kuauthorDemircioğlu, Erhan
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Philosophy
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.yokid193390
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:57:34Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I respond to Kriegel's criticism of McGinn's mysterianism (the thesis that humans are cognitively closed with respect to the solution of the mind-body problem). Kriegel objects to a particular argument for the possibility of human cognitive closure and also gives a direct argument against mysterianism. I intend to show that neither the objection nor the argument is convincing.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume32
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12136-016-0295-y
dc.identifier.eissn1874-6349
dc.identifier.issn0353-5150
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84963647489
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-016-0295-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/15317
dc.identifier.wos397116600008
dc.keywordsCognitive closure
dc.keywordsMysterianism
dc.keywordsThe mind-body problem
dc.keywordsColinMcGinn
dc.keywordsUriah Kriegel
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.sourceActa Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.titleHuman cognitive closure and mysterianism: reply to Kriegel
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-1579-7505
local.contributor.kuauthorDemircioğlu, Erhan
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication005b6224-491a-49b4-9afc-a4413d87712b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery005b6224-491a-49b4-9afc-a4413d87712b

Files