Publication:
Can COFs replace MOFs in flue gas separation? high-throughput computational screening of COFs for CO2/N2 separation

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorKeskin, Seda
dc.contributor.kuauthorAltundal, Ömer Faruk
dc.contributor.kuauthorAltıntaş, Çiğdem
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.kuprofileResearcher
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.yokid40548
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:16:15Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractCovalent organic frameworks (COFs) are under study as adsorbent and membrane candidates for gas separation applications. However, experimental testing of all synthesized COF materials as adsorbents and membranes under different operating conditions is not practical. Herein, we used a high-throughput computational screening approach to investigate adsorption- and membrane-based flue gas separation performances of 295 COFs. Adsorption selectivity, working capacity, percent regenerability and adsorbent performance score of COFs were calculated for separation of CO2/N(2)mixture for three different cyclic adsorption processes, pressure swing adsorption (PSA), vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) and temperature swing adsorption (TSA). The top performing COFs were identified for each process based on the combination of several metrics. Selectivities of the top COFs were predicted to be greater than those of zeolites and activated carbons. Molecular simulations were performed considering the wet flue gas for the top COF adsorbents and results revealed that most COFs retained their high CO(2)selectivities in the presence of water. Using COFs with detailed geometry optimization and high-accuracy partial charges in molecular simulations led to lower selectivities and adsorbent performance scores compared to using experimentally reported COFs with approximate charges. Membrane-based flue gas separation performances of COFs were also studied and most COFs were found to have comparable CO(2)permeabilities with metal organic frameworks (MOFs), up to 3.96 x 10(6)barrer, however their membrane selectivities were lower than MOFs, 0.38-21, due to their large pores and the lack of metal sites in their frameworks. Structure-performance relations revealed that among the COFs we studied, the ones with pore sizes <10 angstrom, accessible surface areas <4500 m(2)g(-1)and 0.6 < porosity <0.8 are not only highly selective adsorbents but also CO(2)selective membranes.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.issue29
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuEU
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council (ERC) 2017- Starting Grant
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union (European Union)
dc.description.sponsorshipHorizon 2020
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume8
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/d0ta04574h
dc.identifier.eissn2050-7496
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR02357
dc.identifier.issn2050-7488
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta04574h
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092256413
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/1377
dc.identifier.wos553632500019
dc.keywordsCovalent organic frameworks
dc.keywordsStructure-property relationships
dc.keywordsPostcombustion CO2 capture
dc.keywordsCarbon-dioxide separation
dc.keywordsPorous materials
dc.keywordsAdsorption
dc.keywordsPerformance
dc.keywordsCO2/N-2
dc.keywordsCrystalline
dc.keywordsMembranes
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
dc.relation.grantno756489-COSMOS
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/8993
dc.sourceJournal of Materials Chemistry A
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectEnergy and fuels
dc.subjectMaterials science
dc.titleCan COFs replace MOFs in flue gas separation? high-throughput computational screening of COFs for CO2/N2 separation
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-5968-0336
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.kuauthorKeskin, Seda
local.contributor.kuauthorAltundal, Ömer Faruk
local.contributor.kuauthorAltıntaş, Çiğdem
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationc747a256-6e0c-4969-b1bf-3b9f2f674289
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc747a256-6e0c-4969-b1bf-3b9f2f674289

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
8993.pdf
Size:
1.24 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format