Publication:
Integration of virtual and traditional medical education: scholarship pivots from the Covid-19 pandemic

dc.contributor.coauthorTang, Sherry Y. Q.
dc.contributor.coauthorKozlow, Jeffrey H.
dc.contributor.coauthorSandhu, Gurjit
dc.contributor.coauthorCederna, Paul S.
dc.contributor.kuauthorBerberoğlu, İpek
dc.contributor.kuauthorSezgin, Billur
dc.contributor.researchcenter 
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unit 
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:39:28Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic required an unprecedented transformation of medical education, shifting from traditional, in-person learning to distanced, online learning. This study aimed to review changes to medical education and describe the advantages and disadvantages of virtual medical education experienced by medical students during the pandemic. Methods: An online survey study was conducted at two medical schools, University of Michigan Medical School in the United States and Koc University School of Medicine in Turkey. Medical students completed questionnaires regarding their educational experience before and during the pandemic. Survey instruments were designed to assess differences in the educational curriculum, study methods, clinical skills self-evaluations, perceptions of the quality of in-person and online learning, and overall satisfaction. Results: A total of 184 medical students completed the survey. There was an increase in the use of online study tools since the pandemic. There was no statistically significant difference in self-reported assessments of clinical preparedness and overall clinical competence during surgical clerkship. The percentage of students interested in pursuing a career in surgery has nearly doubled from 34% to 63%. A majority of students (83%) believed that the time available for self-study and research increased during the pandemic. Fifty-two percent of students believed that online education is less efficacious than in-person education, but 86% of students still preferred a blended approach. Conclusions: Medical schools have continued to update their curricula following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study illustrates the transformations in medical education to ensure that the most effective and suitable teaching is delivered.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.openaccessgold, Green Accepted
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsors 
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/GOX.0000000000005910
dc.identifier.eissn 
dc.identifier.issn2169-7574
dc.identifier.link 
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85196710702
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005910
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22996
dc.identifier.wos1247135300002
dc.keywordsMedical student
dc.keywordsCovid-19 epidemic
dc.keywordsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
dc.languageen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.grantno 
dc.rights 
dc.sourcePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleIntegration of virtual and traditional medical education: scholarship pivots from the Covid-19 pandemic
dc.typeJournal article
dc.type.other 
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorBerberoğlu, İpek
local.contributor.kuauthorSezgin, Billur

Files