Publication:
Assessing the impact of distortion correction on gamma knife radiosurgery for multiple metastasis: volumetric and dosimetric analysis

dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorAskeroğlu, Mehmet Orbay
dc.contributor.kuauthorPeker, Selçuk
dc.contributor.kuauthorSamancı, Mustafa Yavuz
dc.contributor.kuauthorDüzkalır, Ali Haluk
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:34:06Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a robust neuroimaging technique and is the preferred method for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. However, MRI data always contain distortions caused by hardware and patient factors. Research question: Can these distortions potentially compromise the effectiveness and safety of SRS treatments? Material and methods: Twenty-six MR datasets with multiple metastatic brain tumors (METs) used for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively evaluated. A commercially available software was used for distortion correction. Geometrical agreement between corrected and uncorrected tumor volumes was evaluated using MacDonald criteria, Euclidian distance, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). SRS plans were generated using uncorrected tumor volumes, which were assessed to determine their coverage of the corrected tumor volumes. Results: The median target volume was 0.38 cm3 (range,0.01–12.38 cm3). A maximum displacement of METs of up to 2.87 mm and a median displacement of 0.55 mm (range,0.1–2.87 mm) were noted. The median DSC between uncorrected and corrected MRI was 0.92, and the most concerning case had a DSC of 0.46. Although all plans met the optimization criterion of at least 98% of the uncorrected tumor volume (median 99.55%, range 98.1–100%) receiving at least 100% of the prescription dose, the percent of the corrected tumor volume receiving the total prescription dose was a median of 95.45% (range,23.1–99.5%). Discussion and conclusion: MRI distortion, though visually subtle, has significant implications for SRS planning. Regular utilization of corrected MRI is recommended for SRS planning as distortion is sometimes enough to cause a volumetric miss of SRS targets. © 2024 The Authors
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessAll Open Access; Gold Open Access
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume4
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bas.2024.102791
dc.identifier.issn27725294
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85189009541
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2024.102791
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26729
dc.identifier.wos1221109900001
dc.keywordsDisplacement
dc.keywordsDistortion
dc.keywordsGamma Knife radiosurgery
dc.keywordsMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.keywordsMetastatic brain tumors
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofBrain and Spine
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleAssessing the impact of distortion correction on gamma knife radiosurgery for multiple metastasis: volumetric and dosimetric analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorPeker, Selçuk
local.contributor.kuauthorSamancı, Mustafa Yavuz
local.contributor.kuauthorAskeroğlu, Mehmet Orbay
local.contributor.kuauthorDüzkalır, Ali Haluk
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR04841.pdf
Size:
2.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format