Publication: Order ahead for pickup: promise or peril?
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Sun, K.
Liu, Y.
Yang, L.
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
eng
Type
Embargo Status
N/A
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Problem definition: Mobile technologies have increasingly enabled remote customers to order ahead at quick-service restaurants. As customers travel to the service facility to pick up their orders, their orders also advance in the food preparation queue. It is widely believed that the ability to order ahead reduces customers’ total delay and, therefore, allows restaurants to attract more orders and achieve higher throughput than if customers must order onsite. Methodology results: We build a queueing game–theoretic model to study a mixed ordering scheme in which some customers order ahead and some order on-site. Our analysis shows that the common practice of accepting all orders as they come in and requiring all orders to be irrevocable can cause a mixed ordering scheme to surprisingly achieve lower throughput than an on-site–only ordering scheme. The throughput shortfall can persist even when the service provider freely chooses whether to share queue-length information with remote customers. However, if remote customers who order ahead are allowed to cancel unprepared orders when they arrive at the service facility, then such a mixed ordering scheme with cancellation achieves higher throughput than the on-site–only ordering scheme even though it does not uniformly dominate the original mixed ordering scheme (without cancellations). We then study a capped ordering scheme in which the service provider stops accepting new remote orders if the number of outstanding orders reaches a certain threshold. When the service provider optimally sets the cap, the mixed–capped ordering scheme outperforms both the mixed ordering scheme without capping and the on-site–only ordering scheme in throughput but not necessarily the cancellation scheme. Finally, we propose an optimal mechanism in which the service provider determines both the capping and cancellation thresholds subject to customers’ individual rationality constraints. Managerial implications: Our paper highlights the unintended consequences of ordering ahead and provides prescriptive guidance for managing such a service system. Funding: The work of K. Sun was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China [Grant 9244031]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2024.0865 .
Source
Publisher
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
Subject
Economics, Business, Management and accounting, Management information systems, Organizational behavior and human resource management
Citation
Has Part
Source
Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1287/msom.2024.0865
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
N/A
Copyrights Note
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as N/A
