Publication:
Clinical and radiological analysis of the effects of three different lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization system on disc degeneration and regeneration

dc.contributor.coauthorKaradag, M.K.
dc.contributor.coauthorBasak A.T.
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorBaran, Oğuz
dc.contributor.kuauthorAkgün, Mehmet Yiğit
dc.contributor.kuauthorGünerbüyük, Caner
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzer, Ali Fahir
dc.contributor.kuauthorSasani, Mehdi
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖktenoğlu, Bekir Tunç
dc.contributor.kuauthorAteş, Özkan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:27:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of three transpedicular dynamic systems in treating degenerative disc disease and evaluate their impact on both clinical and radiological aspects of the operated and adjacent segments.Materials and methods: A total of 111 patients who underwent posterior transpedicular short-segment dynamic system procedures for treatment of degenerative disc disease were included. The patients were categorized into three groups, namely, Group 1 (Dynesys system, n = 38), Group 2 (Safinaz screw + PEEK rod, n = 37), and Group 3 (Safinaz screw + titanium rod, n = 36). Disc regeneration in the operated segment and disc degeneration in the operated, upper, and lower adjacent segments were assessed using the Pfirrmann Classification.Results: Postoperatively, a statistically significant difference was observed in visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores (p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was seen in disc degeneration/regeneration and degeneration scores of the upper and lower adjacent segments between the preoperative and postoperative groups (p = 0.763, p = 0.518, p = 0.201). Notably, a positive effect on disc regeneration at the operated level (32.4%) was observed. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of operation rates, screw loosening, and screw breakage after adjacent segment disease (p > 0.05).Conclusion: In patients without advanced degeneration, all three dynamic systems demonstrated the ability to prevent degeneration in the adjacent and operated segments while promoting regeneration in the operated segment. Beyond inhibiting abnormal movement in painful segments, maintaining physiological motion and providing axial distraction in the operated segment emerged as key mechanisms supporting regeneration.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume10
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fsurg.2023.1297790
dc.identifier.issn2296-875X
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194055308&
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1297790
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/25625
dc.identifier.wos1129981800001
dc.keywordsDisc regeneration
dc.keywordsDisc degeneration
dc.keywordsLumbar dynamic systems
dc.keywordsLordosis angl
dc.keywordsIntervertebral disc
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Sa
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Surgery
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleClinical and radiological analysis of the effects of three different lumbar transpedicular dynamic stabilization system on disc degeneration and regeneration
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorAkgün, Mehmet Yiğit
local.contributor.kuauthorGünerbüyük, Caner
local.contributor.kuauthorAteş, Özkan
local.contributor.kuauthorBaran, Oğuz
local.contributor.kuauthorÖktenoğlu, Bekir Tunç
local.contributor.kuauthorSasani, Mehdi
local.contributor.kuauthorÖzer, Ali Fahir
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR05146.pdf
Size:
4.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format