Publication:
Clinical validation of embryo prognostic tests; determining predictive value: phase 2

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Pirtea, Paul (56737504800)
Su, Irene H. (60142506600)
Frisk Toft, Christian Liebst (60142539200)
Kalafat, Erkan (56388776400)

Publication Date

Language

Type

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Clinical prognostic and diagnostic tests should be safe and effective. Tests that predict the competence of embryos to implant and progress to a live birth or an offspring without an inherited genetic condition are no different. However, tests performed on human embryos can be more challenging to validate than virtually any other group of clinical tests. Understanding those challenges is the key to designing and implementing an effective validation paradigm for clinical embryo testing. This manuscript details the methodology of performing clinical validation of embryo tests. The manuscript covers the concepts and differences of prognostic and diagnostic tests, mosaicism, choice of endpoint measures, what study design to use, sample size calculation, patient cohorts, the importance of blinding, and data analysis and interpretation. Preimplantation genetic tests are used as an example because of widespread use. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier Inc.

Subject

Citation

Has Part

Source

Fertility and Sterility

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.08.011

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)

Copyrights Note

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details