Publication:
Clinicopathologic differences between micropapillary and papillary thyroid carcinoma

dc.contributor.coauthorAygün, Nurcihan
dc.contributor.coauthorUludağ, Mehmet
dc.contributor.kuauthorKartal, Kinyas
dc.contributor.kuprofileDoctor
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:43:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractObjectives: the aim of this study is observing the clinicopathologic features of thyroid papillary microcarcinomas (PTMs) and comparing these features with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Methods: a total of 86 surgically treated patients suffering from PTC were evaluated retrospectively. Group 1 (G1) included patients with a tumor <1 cm, while Group 2 (G2) included patients with a tumor >1 cm. The two groups were compared in terms of the preoperative thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level, anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (anti-TPO) and antithyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) values, multicentricity, the lymphovascular invasion rate, the presence of extrathyroidal extension, and central and/or lateral lymph node metastasis. Results: there was no statistically significant difference observed between the groups in terms of the preoperative TSH level, anti-TPO, and TgAb values. The rate of multicentricity of the tumor in G2 was 66%, while it was 36% in G1 (p<0.001). The lymphovascular invasion rate in G1 was 14.2%, while it was 61% in G2 (p<0.001). The extrathyroidal extension rate of the tumor cells in G1 was 21.4%, while it was 63.6% in G2 (p<0.001). The central lymph node metastasis rate in G2 was 38.6%, while it was 4.8% in G1 (p<0.001). The lateral lymph node metastasis rate in G2 was 20.5%, while it was 0% in G1 (p<0.001). Conclusion: PTMs are generally associated with good prognostic factors with high survival rates. However, the risk factors such as multifocality, extrathyroidal extension, and lymphovascular invasion increasing the recurrence risk are not rare in PTM. Thus, the patients having these histopathological features of the tumor should be followed more carefully.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume53
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/SEMB.2019.68790
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR01843
dc.identifier.issn1302-7123
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2019.68790
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/2365
dc.identifier.wos475471600007
dc.keywordsExtrathyroidal extension
dc.keywordsLymphovascular invasion
dc.keywordsLymph node metastasis
dc.keywordsPrognosis
dc.keywordsThyroid papillary carcinoma
dc.keywordsThyroid micropapillary carcinoma
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherKare Yayıncılık
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/8457
dc.sourceMedical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital / Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni
dc.subjectGeneral and internal medicine
dc.titleClinicopathologic differences between micropapillary and papillary thyroid carcinoma
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKartal, Kinyas

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
8457.pdf
Size:
197.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format