Publication:
IUBMB/PSBMB 2019 conference/plenary: mentoring in postgraduate training and the role of organization for PhD education in health sciences in European system

dc.contributor.coauthorN/A
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorOrer, Hakan S.
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:26:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractA vibrant and sustainable research environment is essential to establish a thriving PhD program. Organization for PhD Education in Health Sciences in European System, a European platform to promote best practices in PhD education in health sciences, published a guideline entitled "Best Practices for PhD Training." The guideline includes comprehensive recommendations and suggestions on different components of the PhD program, of which supervision is an essential one. A working supervisor-student relationship based on mutual respect, responsibility, and participation is essential for the success of a PhD thesis. Supervisors should be active researchers and receive training to develop their supervising skills. They serve as role models in academic life, both scientifically and ethically. The appointment of a co-supervisor, besides the principal one, is strongly encouraged not only to increase the efficiency in monitoring the student progression but also to defuse interpersonal conflicts. Institutional regulations should include the duties and responsibilities of the supervisor. A contract prepared by the institution and signed by the supervisor and the student could help specify the task and may serve as a starting point. In case of a conflict, grievance mechanisms also need to be clear and explicit. Supervisors ought to assist the career development of the students and guide them to become independent researchers. Unfortunately, different surveys showed that there is widespread discontent among the students about their supervisors. Performance pressure on both students and supervisors create enormous tension. Students feel stressed about their career prospects. Institutional policies should consider these stress points to enhance the wellbeing of students as well as the faculty.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume48
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bmb.21345
dc.identifier.eissn1539-3429
dc.identifier.issn1470-8175
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85082130347
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21345
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/11505
dc.identifier.wos563699400001
dc.keywordsAdvisor
dc.keywordsGuideline
dc.keywordsPhD education
dc.keywordsResearch training
dc.keywordsSupervisor
dc.keywordsThird-cycle training
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofBiochemistry And Molecular Biology Education
dc.subjectBiochemistry
dc.subjectMolecular biology
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectscientific disciplines
dc.titleIUBMB/PSBMB 2019 conference/plenary: mentoring in postgraduate training and the role of organization for PhD education in health sciences in European system
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorOrer, Hakan S.
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files