Publication: Turkey
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
N/A
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
N/A
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
This chapter explains the latter two types of control further below, under 'principals by proxy' and 'joint criminal enterprise'. In case of joint principals, it is argued that in both cases, where the error or aberratio is irrelevant, there is no effect from the viewpoint of criminal responsibility, and all joint participants shall be held responsible as if the intended result had materialised. Where an aider withdraws, academic writings argue that the crime should have been completed independently of the prior contribution of the participant who gave up supporting its commission. Although abettors are subject to the full punishment, they are regarded as secondary participants. As in German law, any person participating in the commission of a negligent offence, if not a principal offender, may only be held responsible under general rules relating to negligence.
Source
Publisher
Ashgate Publishing
Subject
Criminal law, Complicity, Comparative criminal law, Turkish criminal law
Citation
Has Part
Source
Participation in Crime: Domestic and Comparative Perspectives
Book Series Title
Substantive Issues in Criminal Law
Edition
DOI
10.4324/9781315599441-26
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
N/A
