Publication:
Turkey

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
LAW SCHOOL
UPPER

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

N/A

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

This chapter explains the latter two types of control further below, under 'principals by proxy' and 'joint criminal enterprise'. In case of joint principals, it is argued that in both cases, where the error or aberratio is irrelevant, there is no effect from the viewpoint of criminal responsibility, and all joint participants shall be held responsible as if the intended result had materialised. Where an aider withdraws, academic writings argue that the crime should have been completed independently of the prior contribution of the participant who gave up supporting its commission. Although abettors are subject to the full punishment, they are regarded as secondary participants. As in German law, any person participating in the commission of a negligent offence, if not a principal offender, may only be held responsible under general rules relating to negligence.

Source

Publisher

Ashgate Publishing

Subject

Criminal law, Complicity, Comparative criminal law, Turkish criminal law

Citation

Has Part

Source

Participation in Crime: Domestic and Comparative Perspectives

Book Series Title

Substantive Issues in Criminal Law

Edition

DOI

10.4324/9781315599441-26

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

13

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details