Publication:
Effects of force field selection on the computational ranking of MOFs for CO2 separations

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering
dc.contributor.kuauthorKeskin, Seda
dc.contributor.kuauthorDokur, Derya
dc.contributor.kuprofileMaster Student
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.yokid40548
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T13:47:14Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractMetal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been considered as highly promising materials for adsorption-based CO2 separations. The number of synthesized MOFs has been increasing very rapidly. High-throughput molecular simulations are very useful to screen large numbers of MOFs in order to identify the most promising adsorbents prior to extensive experimental studies. Results of molecular simulations depend on the force field used to define the interactions between gas molecules and MOFs. Choosing the appropriate force field for MOFs is essential to make reliable predictions about the materials' performance. In this work, we performed two sets of molecular simulations using the two widely used generic force fields, Dreiding and UFF, and obtained adsorption data of CO2/H-2, CO2/N-2, and CO2/CH4 mixtures in 100 different MOF structures. Using this adsorption data, several adsorbent evaluation metrics including selectivity, working capacity, sorbent selection parameter, and percent regenerability were computed for each MOF. MOFs were then ranked based on these evaluation metrics, and top performing materials were identified. We then examined the sensitivity of the MOF rankings to the force field type. Our results showed that although there are significant quantitative differences between some adsorbent evaluation metrics computed using different force fields, rankings of the top MOF adsorbents for CO2 separations are generally similar: 8, 8, and 9 out of the top 10 most selective MOFs were found to be identical in the ranking for CO2/H-2, CO2/N-2, and CO2/CH4 separations using Dreiding and UFF. We finally suggested a force field factor depending on the energy parameters of atoms present in the MOFs to quantify the robustness of the simulation results to the force field selection. This easily computable factor will be highly useful to determine whether the results are sensitive to the force field type or not prior to performing computationally demanding molecular simulations.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuEU
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union (EU)
dc.description.sponsorshipH2020
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council (ERC)-2017-Starting Grant
dc.description.sponsorshipCOSMOS
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume57
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04792
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR01188
dc.identifier.issn0888-5885
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04792
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85042129274
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/3755
dc.identifier.wos425473900052
dc.keywordsMetal-organic frameworks
dc.keywordsMolecular-dynamics simulations
dc.keywordsCarbon-dioxide
dc.keywordsCapture
dc.keywordsAdsorption
dc.keywordsHydrogen
dc.keywordsGas
dc.keywordsEquilibria
dc.keywordsPrediction
dc.keywordsDiffusion
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Society (ACS)
dc.relation.grantno756489
dc.relation.grantnoCOSMOS
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/8092
dc.sourceIndustrial and Engineering Chemistry Research
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleEffects of force field selection on the computational ranking of MOFs for CO2 separations
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-5968-0336
local.contributor.authoridN/A
local.contributor.kuauthorKeskin, Seda
local.contributor.kuauthorDokur, Derya
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationc747a256-6e0c-4969-b1bf-3b9f2f674289
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc747a256-6e0c-4969-b1bf-3b9f2f674289

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
8092.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format