Publication:
Plasmonic photothermal therapy in third and fourth biological windows

dc.contributor.coauthorN/A
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Physics
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖnal, Emre Doruk
dc.contributor.kuauthorGüven, Kaan
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Physics
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Sciences
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokid52290
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:07:44Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe recently reported third and fourth biological transparency windows located respectively at 1.6-1.9 pm and 2.1-2.3 mu m promise deeper light penetration in many tissue types, yet they have not been utilized in photothermal therapy applications. Nanoparticle-assisted photothermal therapy poses a nontrivial optimization problem in which the light absorption efficiency of the nanoparticle has to be maximized subject to various constraints that are imposed by the application environment. Upscaling the typical absorber dominant nanoparticle designs (e.g., rod, sphere) that operate in the first and second transparency windows is not a viable option as they become increasingly inefficient absorbers, and their size can get prohibitively large for internalization into certain cell strains. The present study addresses this issue and suggests a versatile approach for designing both monolithic and self-assembling absorber dominant nanostructures for the new transparency windows. These nanoparticles are lithographically fabricatable; additionally, they are easily adaptable to low-cost, mass production compatible chemical growth methods. We demonstrate up to 40% size reduction and 2-fold increase in absorption efficiency compared to the conventional nanobar design. The overall photothermal performance in third and fourth windows is improved up to 55% per mass and 17-fold per nanoparticle compared to the second window.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorshipKoc University the authors thank Koc University for supporting this research.
dc.description.volume121
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10060
dc.identifier.eissn1932-7455
dc.identifier.issn1932-7447
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021314098
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10060
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/9184
dc.identifier.wos392035500072
dc.keywordsGold nanorods
dc.keywordsDrug-delivery
dc.keywordsCellular uptake
dc.keywordsCancer-therapy
dc.keywordsNanoparticles
dc.keywordsLight
dc.keywordsDesign
dc.keywordsSize
dc.keywordsNanostructures
dc.keywordsNanorings
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisheramer Chemical Soc
dc.sourceJournal of Physical Chemistry C
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectPhysical chemistry
dc.subjectNanoscience
dc.subjectNanotechnology
dc.subjectMaterials science
dc.titlePlasmonic photothermal therapy in third and fourth biological windows
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-9265-720X
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-1097-5106
local.contributor.kuauthorÖnal, Emre Doruk
local.contributor.kuauthorGüven, Kaan
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationc43d21f0-ae67-4f18-a338-bcaedd4b72a4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc43d21f0-ae67-4f18-a338-bcaedd4b72a4

Files