Publication:
International lawyers as hope mongers: how did we come to believe that democracy was here to stay?

dc.contributor.kuauthorAral, Işıl
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteLaw School
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:40:23Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIt is common these days to lament the recession of democracy around the world. The way scholars address the issue of democratic backsliding shows that there is a significant gap between the expectation about democracy's anticipated course of development and the current state of affairs. This article argues that the expectation that democracy would consolidate over time was produced by the progress narrative of democratic governance discourses. Drawing on narratology, it conducts a discourse analysis to demonstrate that today's dismay about the recession of democracy is due to an unwarranted expectation that was created by the progress narrative of democratic governance discourses. It focuses on the periodisation of history in the construction of these discourses and investigates how scholars used the Cold War - post-Cold War dichotomy to create a progress narrative.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume26
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/15718050-BJA100s8
dc.identifier.eissn1571-8050
dc.identifier.issn1388-199X
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1163/15718050-BJA100s8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/23287
dc.identifier.wos1285311200002
dc.keywordsNarratology
dc.keywordsDiscourse analysis
dc.keywordsPeriodisation
dc.keywordsDemocratic Governance discourses
dc.keywordsCold war
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBRILL
dc.sourceJournal of the History of International Law
dc.subjectLaw
dc.titleInternational lawyers as hope mongers: how did we come to believe that democracy was here to stay?
dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorAral, Işıl

Files