Publication:
Salvage therapies for biochemical recurrence after definitive local treatment: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

dc.contributor.coauthorMatsukawa, Akihiro
dc.contributor.coauthorYanagisawa, Takafumi
dc.contributor.coauthorFazekas, Tamas
dc.contributor.coauthorMiszczyk, Marcin
dc.contributor.coauthorTsuboi, Ichiro
dc.contributor.coauthorKardoust Parizi, Mehdi
dc.contributor.coauthorLaukhtina, Ekaterina
dc.contributor.coauthorKlemm, Jakob
dc.contributor.coauthorMancon, Stefano
dc.contributor.coauthorMori, Keiichiro
dc.contributor.coauthorKimura, Shoji
dc.contributor.coauthorMiki, Jun
dc.contributor.coauthorGomez Rivas, Juan
dc.contributor.coauthorSoeterik, Timo F. W.
dc.contributor.coauthorZilli, Thomas
dc.contributor.coauthorJoniau, Steven
dc.contributor.coauthorKimura, Takahiro
dc.contributor.coauthorShariat, Shahrokh F.
dc.contributor.coauthorRajwa, Pawel
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-06T21:00:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Recent advancements in the management of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following local treatment for prostate cancer (PCa), including the use of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), have broadened the spectrum of therapeutic options. We aimed to compare salvage therapies in patients with BCR after definitive local treatment for clinically non-metastatic PCa with curative intent. METHODS: In October 2023, we queried PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies reporting data on the efficacy of salvage therapies in PCa patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). The primary endpoint was metastatic-free survival (MFS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We included 19 studies (n = 9117);six trials analyzed RT-based strategies following RP, ten trials analyzed hormone-based strategies following RP +/- RT or RT alone, and three trials analyzed other agents. In a pairwise meta-analysis, adding hormone therapy to salvage RT significantly improved MFS (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57-0.84, p < 0.001) compared to RT alone. Based on treatment ranking analysis, among RT-based strategies, the addition of elective nodal RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was found to be the most effective in terms of MFS. On the other hand, among hormone-based strategies, enzalutamide + ADT showed the greatest benefit for both MFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of prostate bed RT, elective pelvic irradiation, and ADT is the preferred treatment for eligible patients with post-RP BCR based on our analysis. In remaining patients, or in case of post-RT recurrence, especially for those with high-risk BCR, the combination of ADT and ARSI should be considered.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna.Tamas Fazekas received the following grants: the EUSP Scholarship of the European Association of Urology (Scholarship S-2023-0006), the New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research Development, and Innovation Fund (UNKP-22-3-1-SE-19).
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41391-024-00890-4
dc.identifier.eissn1476-5608
dc.identifier.grantnoMedical University of Vienna;EUSP Scholarship of the European Association of Urology [S-2023-0006];New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research Development, and Innovation Fund [UNKP-22-3-1-SE-19]
dc.identifier.issn1365-7852
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85203708163
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00890-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/27859
dc.identifier.wos1310718200001
dc.keywordsSalvage therapies
dc.keywordsBiochemical recurrence
dc.keywordsDefinitive local treatment
dc.keywordsSystematic review
dc.keywordsMeta-analysis
dc.keywordsNetwork meta-analysis
dc.keywordsProstate cancer
dc.keywordsOncology
dc.keywordsRadiotherapy
dc.keywordsHormone therapy
dc.keywordsCancer recurrence
dc.keywordsTreatment outcomes
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectUrology and nephrology
dc.titleSalvage therapies for biochemical recurrence after definitive local treatment: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis
dc.typeReview
dc.type.otherEarly access
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR05722.pdf
Size:
1.84 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format