Publication:
Sparing sphincters and laparoscopic resection improve survival by optimizing the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer patients

dc.contributor.coauthorKeskin, M.
dc.contributor.coauthorBayraktar, A.
dc.contributor.coauthorSivirikoz, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorYeğen, G.
dc.contributor.coauthorKarip, B.
dc.contributor.coauthorSağlam, E.
dc.contributor.coauthorBulut, M. T.
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorBalık, Emre
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid18758
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:15:12Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe goal of rectal cancer treatment is to minimize the local recurrence rate and extend the disease-free survival period and survival. For this aim, obtainment of negative circumferential radial margin (CRM) plays an important role. This study evaluated predictive factors for positive CRM status and its effect on patient survival in mid- and distal rectal tumors. Patients who underwent curative resection for rectal cancer were included. The main factors were demographic data, tumor location, surgical technique, neoadjuvant therapy, tumor diameter, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, mesorectal integrity, CRM, the rate of local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall and disease-free survival. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test and the Mantel-Cox log-rank sum test. A total of 420 patients were included, 232 (55%) of whom were male. We observed no significant differences in patient characteristics or surgical treatment between the patients who had positive CRM and who had negative CRM, but a higher positive CRM rate was observed in patients undergone abdominoperineal resection (APR) (P < 0.001). Advanced T-stage (P < 0.001), lymph node invasion (P = 0.001) and incomplete mesorectum (P = 0.007) were encountered significantly more often in patients with positive CRM status. Logistic regression analysis revealed that APR (P < 0.001) and open resection (P = 0.046) were independent predictors of positive CRM status. Moreover, positive CRM was associated with decreased 5-year overall and disease-free survival(P = 0.002 and P = 0.004, respectively). This large single-institution series demonstrated that APR and open resection were independent predictive factors for positive CRM status in rectal cancer. Positive CRM independently decreased the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume95
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/MD.0000000000002669
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR00445
dc.identifier.issn1536-5964
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002669
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84958818099
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/1330
dc.identifier.wos370508200001
dc.keywordsTotal mesorectal excision
dc.keywordsPreoperative radiotherapy
dc.keywordsAbdominoperineal excision
dc.keywordsLocal recurrence
dc.keywordsOpen surgery
dc.keywordsRandomized-trial
dc.keywordsTerm outcomes
dc.keywordsExtralevator
dc.keywordsChemoradiotherapy
dc.keywordsRadiochemotherapy
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/468
dc.sourceMedicine
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleSparing sphincters and laparoscopic resection improve survival by optimizing the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer patients
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-5751-1133
local.contributor.kuauthorBalık, Emre

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
468.pdf
Size:
166.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format