Publication: What does comparative policy analysis have to do with the structure, institution and agency debate?
dc.contributor.department | Department of International Relations | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Bakır, Caner | |
dc.contributor.kuprofile | Faculty Member | |
dc.contributor.other | Department of International Relations | |
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | College of Administrative Sciences and Economics | |
dc.contributor.yokid | 108141 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-09T23:52:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | A growing number of political and policy scientists have utilized institutional theory to explain how the purposeful actions of agents shape and are shaped by structural, institutional, and agential factors. Most current studies, however, have conflated and/or combined the fundamental concepts of structure, institution, and actor, overlooking how their interactions shape policy and institutional outcomes. Furthermore, such research lacks an approach that allows a more comprehensive means to integrate the various dimensions of such interactions. By studying these distinct but interdependent causal factors through an integrative approach, we provide a richer, more comprehensive understanding of contingent conditions, agency, and outcomes. | |
dc.description.indexedby | WoS | |
dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
dc.description.issue | 5 | |
dc.description.openaccess | NO | |
dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEu | TÜBİTAK | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [TUBITAK2219, :1059B192001130] | |
dc.description.volume | 24 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13876988.2022.2045867 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-5448 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1387-6988 | |
dc.identifier.quartile | Q3 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85137975731 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2022.2045867 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/14900 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 854258300001 | |
dc.keywords | Critical realism | |
dc.keywords | Analytic eclecticism | |
dc.keywords | Covid-19 | |
dc.keywords | Policy entrepreneur | |
dc.keywords | Institutional entrepreneur | |
dc.keywords | Institutional complementarity | |
dc.keywords | Enabling condition | |
dc.keywords | Causal mechanisms | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Ltd | |
dc.source | Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis | |
dc.subject | Public administration | |
dc.title | What does comparative policy analysis have to do with the structure, institution and agency debate? | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.authorid | 0000-0001-8166-4623 | |
local.contributor.kuauthor | Bakır, Caner | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126 | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126 |