Publication:
What does comparative policy analysis have to do with the structure, institution and agency debate?

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of International Relations
dc.contributor.facultymemberYes
dc.contributor.kuauthorBakır, Caner
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Administrative Sciences and Economics
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:52:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractA growing number of political and policy scientists have utilized institutional theory to explain how the purposeful actions of agents shape and are shaped by structural, institutional, and agential factors. Most current studies, however, have conflated and/or combined the fundamental concepts of structure, institution, and actor, overlooking how their interactions shape policy and institutional outcomes. Furthermore, such research lacks an approach that allows a more comprehensive means to integrate the various dimensions of such interactions. By studying these distinct but interdependent causal factors through an integrative approach, we provide a richer, more comprehensive understanding of contingent conditions, agency, and outcomes.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.peerreviewstatusN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuTÜBİTAK
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [TUBITAK2219, :1059B192001130]
dc.description.studentonlypublicationNo
dc.description.studentpublicationNo
dc.description.versionN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13876988.2022.2045867
dc.identifier.eissn1572-5448
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage429
dc.identifier.grantnoTUBITAK 2219
dc.identifier.issn1387-6988
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85137975731
dc.identifier.startpage415
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2022.2045867
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/14900
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.identifier.wos000854258300001
dc.keywordsCritical realism
dc.keywordsAnalytic eclecticism
dc.keywordsCovid-19
dc.keywordsPolicy entrepreneur
dc.keywordsInstitutional entrepreneur
dc.keywordsInstitutional complementarity
dc.keywordsEnabling condition
dc.keywordsCausal mechanisms
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.subjectPublic administration
dc.titleWhat does comparative policy analysis have to do with the structure, institution and agency debate?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorBakır, Caner
relation.isGoalOfPublication0e554614-34c1-41f1-b6c4-0096c1d59305
relation.isGoalOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0e554614-34c1-41f1-b6c4-0096c1d59305
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9fc25a77-75a8-48c0-8878-02d9b71a9126
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication972aa199-81e2-499f-908e-6fa3deca434a
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery972aa199-81e2-499f-908e-6fa3deca434a

Files